If you really want to filter as you have specified, then it will take a while.
This is because the entire query must be performed (up to the point you are
applying the order), then sorted, then the top rows selected to match you
limit, then any remaining outer joins performed.
Or you can
move the join to immediately follow the FROM clause
remove the word "left"
> -Original Message-
> From: sqlite-users [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org]
> On Behalf Of MONSTRUO Hugo González
> Sent: Monday, 27 March, 2017 09:35
> To: sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
The main issue there I believe is that the order by/limit for the first two is
on the outermost table, so it can order by/limit that right away. In the last
query the order by/limit is on a table in the middle, so it can't order or
filter on it right away, and needs the temp tree there.
I saw
> On Mar 26, 2017, at 11:37 PM, Hick Gunter wrote:
>
> I think this kind of problem (transfer of information between cooperating
> processes) is best solved using the tools designed for inter-process
> communication and not attempting to abuse a DB system designed to isolate
On 27 Mar 2017, at 4:35pm, MONSTRUO Hugo González
wrote:
> nbmCodigo VARCHAR (6) VARCHAR 6
I wanted to note that SQLite completely ignores VARCHAR and any size limits.
As far as SQLite is concerned, all those fields are TEXT fields and can contain
any number of
Hi,
I have a phone book (bm_ppal), 726.000 rows, 10 columns
This phone book have this columns
Name Declared Type Type Size
nbmId INTEGER INTEGER
nbmCodigo VARCHAR (6) VARCHAR 6
abmNombre VARCHAR (320) VARCHAR 320
abmNombrePlano VARCHAR (320) VARCHAR 320
nbmCiudad INTEGER INTEGER
nbmTelefono
:) Roger that.
> On Mar 27, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Hick Gunter wrote:
>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> em...@n0code.net wrote:
>>> I’ve scoured the archives and the sqlite documentation but can’t find
>>> the definitive rules for defining table and column names.
>>
>>
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>em...@n0code.net wrote:
>> I’ve scoured the archives and the sqlite documentation but can’t find
>> the definitive rules for defining table and column names.
>
>Everything is allowed, except names beginning with "sqlite_".
>
This calls for a (not quite) OT
Wow! Ok - awesome! Thanks!
> On Mar 27, 2017, at 10:45 AM, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
>
> em...@n0code.net wrote:
>> I’ve scoured the archives and the sqlite documentation but can’t find the
>> definitive rules
>> for defining table and column names.
>
> Everything is
em...@n0code.net wrote:
> I’ve scoured the archives and the sqlite documentation but can’t find the
> definitive rules
> for defining table and column names.
Everything is allowed, except names beginning with "sqlite_".
> I did see we can’t use keywords
The documentation disagrees:
* Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Gwendal Roué:
>
>> I have found a regression in SQLite 3.17.0. In the following SQL statements:
>>
>>CREATE VIRTUAL TABLE t1 USING FTS5(content);
>>INSERT INTO t1(content) VALUES ('some text');
>>SELECT last_insert_rowid(); // 10
Hi,
I’ve scoured the archives and the sqlite documentation but can’t find the
definitive rules
for defining table and column names.
I did see we can’t use keywords and tables can not begin with sqlite_. Are
there others?
What characters can we use? Is it the same as MySQL?
Thanks,
Eric
Hey, neat idea! To expand on my previous post:
CREATE TRIGGER wakeup AFTER INSERT ON cmd BEGIN SELECT
cond_broadcast('cmd_ready'); END;
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: sqlite-users [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org] Im
Auftrag von Richard Damon
Gesendet: Sonntag, 26.
I think this kind of problem (transfer of information between cooperating
processes) is best solved using the tools designed for inter-process
communication and not attempting to abuse a DB system designed to isolate
processes from unfinished changes.
Have the processes share a condition
14 matches
Mail list logo