Re: [sqlite] Move to Github!!?

2017-12-25 Thread Jay Kreibich
> On Dec 25, 2017, at 12:24 PM, J. King wrote: > > SQLite source is managed in a Fossil (not Git) repository, which is software > itself designed by Dr. Hipp and based on SQLite. GitHub would be an entirely > inappropriate venue. > > SQLite is also not open source

Re: [sqlite] Move to Github!!?

2017-12-25 Thread Jungle Boogie
On Mon 25 Dec 2017 11:49 PM, Shekhar Reddy wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any particular reason that the source is not moved to GitHub? I > think that would reach more number of people there. > So are you saying it would be the most used in the galaxy? SQLite is the most used database engine in the

[sqlite] SQLite 3.21 on IBM Mainframe - z/OS

2017-12-25 Thread Mario Bezzi
Hello, SQLite 3.21 autoconf (sqlite-autoconf-321.zip) compiles and runs successfully on z/OS 2.2 with few minor modifications which I would like the developers to consider for integration into the code base. Namely: 1 - In sqlite3.c, in the code section coming from tokenize.c, the

[sqlite] FTS5 crash with NULL in snippet() function's 5th parameter

2017-12-25 Thread Tony Papadimitriou
(SQLite v3.21.0 with FTS5 enabled) If instead of ‘’ (empty string) one uses NULL for the 5th parameter in the snippet() function it consistently crashes. Thanks. ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org

Re: [sqlite] Move to Github!!?

2017-12-25 Thread Keith Medcalf
Heavens forbid! --- The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume. >-Original Message- >From: sqlite-users [mailto:sqlite-users- >boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Shekhar Reddy >Sent: Monday, 25 December,

Re: [sqlite] Ubuntu error with 3210000

2017-12-25 Thread petern
Are your linking switches the same in both release and debug? In particular, -ldl (dynamic libraries) ? On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 5:31 AM, raanan barzel wrote: > With sqlite 3.21. embedded in my application, building on Windows (10, > using VS 2017 Community) is

Re: [sqlite] Move to Github!!?

2017-12-25 Thread Stephen Chrzanowski
As stated, SQLite is managed by Fossil, and Fossil is managed by SQLite. (I think it was) Dr Hipp that stated that "Fossil is eating its own dog food". https://www.google.ca/search?q=eating+your+own+dog+food=utf-8=utf-8=firefox-b_rd=cr=0=SENBWvCGOs6fXo7ynMAJ

Re: [sqlite] Move to Github!!?

2017-12-25 Thread J. King
SQLite source is managed in a Fossil (not Git) repository, which is software itself designed by Dr. Hipp and based on SQLite. GitHub would be an entirely inappropriate venue. SQLite is also not open source software in the conventional sense. SQLite is written by a small team of people, and

[sqlite] Move to Github!!?

2017-12-25 Thread Shekhar Reddy
Hi, Is there any particular reason that the source is not moved to GitHub? I think that would reach more number of people there. Regards Shekhar ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org

[sqlite] LSM extension lsm_work

2017-12-25 Thread Josu Diaz de Arcaya
Hi all, I am very happy with the inclusion of LSM extension in sqlite3's code base. I have a question regarding the merging of segments within the database. I noticed that autowork enabled was not enough for keeping disk consumption at bay, the generated database was N times larger than the

[sqlite] Ubuntu error with 3210000

2017-12-25 Thread raanan barzel
With sqlite 3.21. embedded in my application, building on Windows (10, using VS 2017 Community) is error-free. However, building the same application on Ubuntu 16.04 in Release mode is error-free, while Debug mode produces errors: *** /usr/bin/ld: GCCDebug/sqlite3.o: undefined reference