Hi Nico,
Thank you for your answer.
>It's obvious from the function prototype (no DLL/DSO file name
>argument).
Yes, of course. I'm not confusing a string holding a filename and a
function pointer!
>However, you can use sqlite3_load_extension() instead per-DB connection,
>OR, you can even do
Hi,
Having spent "some" time trying to have this function work with dll
extensions, I've come to the [I hope 'wrong'] conclusion that it's
unusable in such case. Indeed, the docs mentions "statically linked
extension". Can someone confirm it won't auto load extensions when
they reside in
Dear Igor,
Thank you _so_ much for comforting hat part of the idea I have in mind.
I have another related question and I hope you or some other guru can
point me towards a solution.
I use SQLite from some interpreted script language under XP (yes I
know). Today's PCs are fast enough to
Hi everyone,
Is it possible to invoke SQLite functions while INITing a loadable
extension?
I ask because I need to know if the design I've in mind is at all
possible. It needs to issue a very simple select on an already opened
DB and fetch one row of data, which could all be done with
Roger,
>You are aware that "standard" SQLite is used in devices with a few
>kilobytes of memory through workstations and servers with gigabytes of it!
That's precisely why such approach is interesting!
>As far as I can tell you want some extra "standard" collation sequences
>and propose
Hello group,
I'd like to have the group opinion about a feature I would find utterly
useful in _standard_ SQLite.
Here's a rewrite of mails sent to hwaci about it, without success so far.
Note: I guess that non pure ASCII characters in the sample strings
below will translate to '?', but you
401 - 406 of 406 matches
Mail list logo
