Maxine Nietz writes:
>
> Is this the way to post a question?
You are doing fine, but here is a link I send to new listserv users sometimes:
http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
___
sqlite-users mailing list
big stone writes:
> - but would a basic subset, like the one described here in March '14 (
>
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/private/sqlite-users/2014-March/051635.html
For non-subscribers to read:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.sqlite.general/86702
> ) :
>
Stephan Beal writes:
> For the small percentage of users who need it (or would even know how to
> apply it). i've been following this list since 2006 or 2007 and i recall
> this topic having come up only a small handful of times, which implies that
> only a small minority of users
> You used the word "immense" which I like - it is an apt description of the
> knowledge and effort needed to add windowing functions to SQLite (and
> probably any other database engine for that matter).
Hehe. I would be interested in any of your specific thoughts on the
immensity of it. I can
Simon Slavin writes:
> Would you care to explain what advantages Window functions would give us
that VIEWs and sub-SELECTs don't
> give us ? I'm not being contrary, I'd like to know.
I have never compared lines of code between the various approaches, but
window functions make it
Has anyone thought in some detail about what it would it take to add window
functions to SQLite?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/tutorial-window.html
For data analysis shops like us (think SAS + baroquely complex Excel + lots
of graphs), SQLite with window functions would be immense.
6 matches
Mail list logo