Re: [sqlite] DeviceSQL

2007-12-13 Thread steveweick
Good idea... I'll pass it along to the right folks. Meanwhile, if anyone has further questions or comments, please feel free to write me here (if they think the group would be interested) or at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Steve I would like to recommend that Encriq create a forum or mailing list of

Re: [sqlite] DeviceSQL

2007-12-13 Thread steveweick
: > > steveweick wrote: >> Richard has it right this time. Today DeviceSQL uses no SQLite code. One >> of >> the things we might consider is bolting the SQLite parser/front end to >> our >> table engine, in theory to get the both worlds. Just an idea at the >> mome

Re: [sqlite] DeviceSQL

2007-12-13 Thread steveweick
Richard has it right this time. Today DeviceSQL uses no SQLite code. One of the things we might consider is bolting the SQLite parser/front end to our table engine, in theory to get the both worlds. Just an idea at the moment. Steve D. Richard Hipp wrote: > > Joe Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [sqlite] DeviceSQL

2007-12-13 Thread steveweick
As shown another thread, Richard has his facts wrong. See http://www.nabble.com/Improving-performance-of-SQLite.-Anyone-heard-of-DeviceSQL--to14280006.html#a14317195 Steve A. Pagaltzis wrote: > > * John Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-12 17:55]: >> In general claims of "20x" or even "5x"

Re: [sqlite] DeviceSQL

2007-12-13 Thread steveweick
I hope this is not a double post, but this was answered in another thread. See http://www.nabble.com/Improving-performance-of-SQLite.-Anyone-heard-of-DeviceSQL--to14280006.html#a14317195 D. Richard Hipp wrote: > > John Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I received an email promoting a

Re: [sqlite] Improving performance of SQLite. Anyone heard of DeviceSQL?

2007-12-13 Thread steveweick
oops, fingers are moving faster than the brain :-) of course, you are right, Dennis. Steve Dennis Cote wrote: > > steveweick wrote: >> the tests were done >> using Windows XP SP2 and Linux FC5 on a 3GHz P4 with 1MB >> > > That must be very slow. ;-) > >

RE: [sqlite] Improving performance of SQLite. Anyone heard of DeviceSQL?

2007-12-13 Thread steveweick
Hi Sam, re your points below: 1. I think I said "innovative", not "revolutionary". The scheme involves using "dirty bits" rather than a log to record the transactional state of a page. 2. We plan on publishing all the details of the benchmarks in a few days. But to answer your question about

Re: [sqlite] Improving performance of SQLite. Anyone heard of DeviceSQL?

2007-12-13 Thread steveweick
of marketing blather. By the way, I don't know where Richard got the stuff about me leaving the mailing list... it never happened. Steve steveweick wrote: > > > > D. Richard Hipp wrote: >> >> Ion Silvestru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >SW: Richard, We have

Re: [sqlite] Improving performance of SQLite. Anyone heard of DeviceSQL?

2007-12-13 Thread steveweick
D. Richard Hipp wrote: > > Ion Silvestru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >SW: Richard, We have written to you directly before to ask you to stop >> the >> >FUD and incorrect statements, and you have chosen to continue. I suggest >> you >> >not waste everyone's time by circulating deliberately

Re: [sqlite] Improving performance of SQLite. Anyone heard of DeviceSQL?

2007-12-12 Thread steveweick
This is Steve Weick, CTO & VP Engineering at Encirq Corp., developers and IP owners of DeviceSQL. I would like to address D. Richard Hipp’s statements. RDH:"If you view their web presentation and/or try out Encirq's products, I would be very interested to hear your impressions. Even better would