Trevor Talbot wrote:
Michael is referring to a direct map from disk pages to memory pages
(OS notion of pages, not sqlite's), using something like mmap() on
unix or MapViewOfFile() on Windows. This way memory is directly
backed by the file it refers to, instead of copying the data to
entirely
Michael is referring to a direct map from disk pages to memory pages
(OS notion of pages, not sqlite's), using something like mmap() on
unix or MapViewOfFile() on Windows. This way memory is directly
backed by the file it refers to, instead of copying the data to
entirely new pages (possibly
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:45:54 +0200, you wrote:
Hi Michael
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Jay Sprenkle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. September 2006 15:37
>An: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
>Betreff: Re: [sqlite] Memory mapped db
>That's not really
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:32:03 +0200, you wrote:
>
>Has anyone tested an sqlite which memory-maps the db-file into ram? Is this
>an old (maybe bad idea :-) ? I've looked over the source and it seems that
>read and write operations are used through a singled interface, so it maybe
>possible to
Michael Wohlwend wrote:
Has anyone tested an sqlite which memory-maps the db-file into ram? Is this
an old (maybe bad idea :-) ? I've looked over the source and it seems that
read and write operations are used through a singled interface, so it maybe
possible to implement it without too much
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jay Sprenkle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. September 2006 15:37
An: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Betreff: Re: [sqlite] Memory mapped db
>use the database named:memory:
>for a ram database. In a lot of cases it will be
use the database named:memory:
for a ram database. In a lot of cases it will be cached by
the operating system so it ends up being that way anyway!
On 9/28/06, Michael Wohlwend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has anyone tested an sqlite which memory-maps the db-file into ram? Is this
an old
Has anyone tested an sqlite which memory-maps the db-file into ram? Is this
an old (maybe bad idea :-) ? I've looked over the source and it seems that
read and write operations are used through a singled interface, so it maybe
possible to implement it without too much trouble...
Any comments
8 matches
Mail list logo