Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3

2009-02-10 Thread W Allan Edwards
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3 > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > W Allan Edwards wrote: > > By preprocessor do you mean #define? > > It is a #define if in C source and -D if a compiler argument. &g

Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3

2009-02-10 Thread W Allan Edwards
platform. : - ) You guys are awesome at support. Thanks again for exploration of this issue with me. Allan> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:17:30 -0800> From: rog...@rogerbinns.com> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3> &

Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3

2009-02-09 Thread D. Richard Hipp
On Feb 9, 2009, at 10:19 AM, W Allan Edwards wrote: > > you would think for desktop Linux (Ubuntu) with the average pc > carrying 2 gigs of ram today they would compile t with all > configurations on. There are a couple of factors here. (1) I am philosophically opposed to the entire

Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3

2009-02-09 Thread John Stanton
l features if it is over say... 4 megabytes? hehe Almost seems now > you need a sqliter.. but 300 million installs later can't be wrong. > > Allan > > >> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:53:12 -0600 >> From: jo...@viacognis.com >> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org >> Subject

Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3

2009-02-09 Thread Nuno Lucas
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:19 PM, W Allan Edwards wrote: > I thought sqlite was originally designed and developed by Dr. Hipp so he > could learn database technology? (SQL database stuff) Then after years and > years and 3 versions later the thing has found it's way

Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3

2009-02-09 Thread W Allan Edwards
is.com > To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org > Subject: Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3 > > You do not appear to understand the intent of Sqlite. It is an open > source software library which can be comiled to siuit unique application > requirements. Decid

Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3

2009-02-09 Thread John Stanton
plodes and I get that import message. > > FYI > > http://sqlite.phxsoftware.com/ > > From: silicon_pla...@hotmail.com > To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org > Subject: RE: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3 > Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 22:47:33 -0600 > > > &

Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3

2009-02-08 Thread W Allan Edwards
@sqlite.org Subject: RE: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3 Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 22:47:33 -0600 > That doesn't make any sense. (you sound like all my old girlfriends) Did you > mean sqlite3.c? If you define the > same thing multiple times in the same co

Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3

2009-02-08 Thread W Allan Edwards
t;<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<&

Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3

2009-02-08 Thread Roger Binns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 W Allan Edwards wrote: > By preprocessor do you mean #define? It is a #define if in C source and -D if a compiler argument. > I did a search in my sqlite.c file for > > SQLITE_ENABLE_COLUMN_METADATA.. then I #defined above them ALL! That

Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3

2009-02-08 Thread John Machin
On 9/02/2009 2:47 PM, W Allan Edwards wrote: > > By preprocessor do you mean #define? I did a search in my sqlite.c file for > > SQLITE_ENABLE_COLUMN_METADATA.. then I #defined above them ALL! The usual way of doing such a thing is somewhat less intrusive and labour-intensive and easier to

Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3

2009-02-08 Thread W Allan Edwards
it would have something do with the .configure fun file? > Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 18:10:19 -0800 > From: rog...@rogerbinns.com > To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org > Subject: Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3 > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1

Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3

2009-02-08 Thread Roger Binns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 W Allan Edwards wrote: > You then tell me to go define that symbol in my c source file No. You have to have it defined when compiling SQLite. Defining it elsewhere such as your C source will have no effect. It affects the compilation of SQLite

Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3

2009-02-08 Thread W Allan Edwards
pecifically C/C++) will help you with tech realization at all levels! : - ) But you adding that in is VERY helpful, it cuts the ambiguity in your communication. Allan > Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:34:17 -0800 > From: rog...@rogerbinns.com > To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org > Subject: Re:

Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3

2009-02-08 Thread Roger Binns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 W Allan Edwards wrote: > I find it odd you have different expected behavior for the same code on each > different platform. What specifically are you referring to there? > The windows version works great... when I move the "same" code over to the

Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3

2009-02-08 Thread W Allan Edwards
ntry point offerings for each platform of the same sqlite database version? Allan > Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:24:32 -0800 > From: rog...@rogerbinns.com > To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org > Subject: Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3 > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3

2009-02-08 Thread Roger Binns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 W Allan Edwards wrote: > What is interesting is that on windows the same managed provider works fine > (sqlite). But on linux I receive this error. That is because the Windows SQLite DLL is compiled by the SQLite team with

Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3

2009-02-08 Thread W Allan Edwards
are using the same versions of the same tools? Allan > Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 01:03:48 -0800 > From: rog...@rogerbinns.com > To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org > Subject: Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3 > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1

Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3

2009-02-04 Thread Roger Binns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 W Allan Edwards wrote: > Unhandled Exception: System.EntryPointNotFoundException: > sqlite3_column_origin_name Consult the documentation: http://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/column_database_name.html Note that SQLITE_ENABLE_COLUMN_METADATA must be defined

[sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3

2009-02-03 Thread W Allan Edwards
Unhandled Exception: System.EntryPointNotFoundException: sqlite3_column_origin_name I am getting this issue on a mono based application that utilizes the sphinx .net 2.0 ado.net adaptor for sqlite. I have installed the latest sqlite on my Ubuntu Linux 8.10 but I get this issue. My guess is