Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 12:59:37PM +0100: Christian Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Guillaume Fougnies wrote:
>
> >Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 11:56:21PM -0700: Darren Duncan wrote:
> >>
> >> What you probably saw with the 3ms is the time between when you
> >> issued the insert command and when control
George Ionescu wrote:
>
> If the database becomes corrupted after a power failure while inserting
> records, is there any way of repairing the database?
>
No.
--
D. Richard Hipp -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- 704.948.4565
Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 11:56:21PM -0700: Darren Duncan wrote:
> At 9:20 AM +0300 9/7/04, George Ionescu wrote:
> >as Nuno Lucas suggested, I've tried inserting one record using
> >synchronous = OFF. That makes a *huge* difference: 150 ms
> >(synchronous=FULL) vs. 3 ms (synchronous=OFF) !! So I'm
At 9:20 AM +0300 9/7/04, George Ionescu wrote:
as Nuno Lucas suggested, I've tried inserting one record using
synchronous = OFF. That makes a *huge* difference: 150 ms
(synchronous=FULL) vs. 3 ms (synchronous=OFF) !! So I'm asking this:
anyone has had any real-word experience with multi-user
Hello sqlite users,
Hello dr. Hipp,
as Nuno Lucas suggested, I've tried inserting one record using synchronous = OFF. That
makes a *huge* difference: 150 ms (synchronous=FULL) vs. 3 ms (synchronous=OFF) !! So
I'm asking this: anyone has had any real-word experience with multi-user access and
5 matches
Mail list logo