Re: [sqlite] SQLite and Windows 95

2014-09-08 Thread BlackWingCat
in context: http://sqlite.1065341.n5.nabble.com/SQLite-and-Windows-95-tp5271p77748.html Sent from the SQLite mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite

Re: [sqlite] SQLite and Windows 95

2010-12-22 Thread joel . guittet-ext
Hi, Thanks to you to help me with this problem. As I do not require special features (only insert/select/order by/delete), I think it is maybe easier to use an old version of SQLite. I will try with 3.6.10 as said by Max. If it does not work I will try an older one. Regards, Joel

Re: [sqlite] SQLite and Windows 95

2010-12-21 Thread Max Vlasov
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:06 PM, wrote: > I wonder about something : those functions are in kernel32.dll on a XP > computer. Is it possible (I never do that before), to take the file > "kernel32.dll" on my XP computer, to put it on the Win95 computer in the

Re: [sqlite] SQLite and Windows 95

2010-12-21 Thread Random Coder
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:06 AM, wrote: > I wonder about something : those functions are in kernel32.dll on a XP > computer. Is it possible (I never do that before), to take the file > "kernel32.dll" on my XP computer, to put it on the Win95 computer in the

Re: [sqlite] SQLite and Windows 95

2010-12-21 Thread Simon Slavin
On 21 Dec 2010, at 6:06pm, joel.guittet-...@transport.alstom.com wrote: > Is it possible (I never do that before), to take the file > "kernel32.dll" on my XP computer, to put it on the Win95 computer in the > directory of my SQLite application This will not work. The kernel /is/ pretty-much

Re: [sqlite] SQLite and Windows 95

2010-12-21 Thread Igor Tandetnik
On 12/21/2010 1:06 PM, joel.guittet-...@transport.alstom.com wrote: > I wonder about something : those functions are in kernel32.dll on a XP > computer. Is it possible (I never do that before), to take the file > "kernel32.dll" on my XP computer, to put it on the Win95 computer in the > directory

Re: [sqlite] SQLite and Windows 95

2010-12-21 Thread joel . guittet-ext
Hi Max and Richard, Thanks for reply. To Max: I agree, I do not have unicode support. The call to GetFileAttributesExW is in "if( isNT() )", which returns FALSE under Win95, so I removed the call to GetFileAttributesExW (It is not a problem if I considered that the software is build for a

Re: [sqlite] SQLite and Windows 95

2010-12-20 Thread Max Vlasov
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:44 PM, wrote: > > - Using the SQLite sources in my project, but the application do not start > any more on Windows 95 : error message is that the application is linked > to kernel32.dll and that function GetFileAttributesExW is not

Re: [sqlite] SQLite and Windows 95

2010-12-20 Thread Richard Hipp
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:51 PM, wrote: > > Or if it is not possible to use SQLite, which simple database can I use on > Win95 ? > SQLite can probably be made to work on Win95. It used to work on Win95. But we do not have (and have not had for years) the

Re: [sqlite] SQLite and Windows 95

2010-12-20 Thread joel . guittet-ext
Hi Kees, Thanks for your reply. I'm surprised, in the source code of SQLite (file sqlite3.c), there are a lot of references to Win95/98/Me. If I want to use SQLite under Win95, which (stable) version can I use ? I do not need so special functions, just making 3 tables and insert/select/delete

Re: [sqlite] SQLite and Windows 95

2010-12-20 Thread Kees Nuyt
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:44:10 +, joel.guittet-...@transport.alstom.com wrote: > Hi, > >I'm working with SQLite since few months. I'm developping an application >with Visual C++ 6.0 and with SQLite 3.7.2. This application works fine on >my computer, which is running Windows XP. > >But the

[sqlite] SQLite and Windows 95

2010-12-20 Thread joel . guittet-ext
Hi, I'm working with SQLite since few months. I'm developping an application with Visual C++ 6.0 and with SQLite 3.7.2. This application works fine on my computer, which is running Windows XP. But the final hardware is under Windows 95, and the application does not run on it. I tried : -