-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org] On Behalf Of
Jean-Christophe Deschamps
Sent: Tuesday, 9 June 2015 5:16 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] User-defined types -- in Andl
At 08:27 09/06/2015, you wrote:
>Andl is at a slightly higher level than
sage-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Petite
Abeille
Sent: Monday, 15 June 2015 1:56 AM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] User-defined types -- in Andl
> On Jun 14, 2015, at
te-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org] On Behalf Of
Jean-Christophe Deschamps
Sent: Tuesday, 9 June 2015 10:54 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] User-defined types -- in Andl
At 13:50 09/06/2015, you wrote:
>BTW I don't remember the last
> On Jun 14, 2015, at 4:01 PM, david at andl.org wrote:
>
> First, I added a RECURSE() function to Andl, similar to the CTE in SQLite.
Nice.
> The Mandelbrot algorithm looks like this.
Could we see something more, hmmm, pedestrian? Perhaps a simple recursive
query, showing, say, all the
Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Richard
Hipp
Sent: Thursday, 11 June 2015 2:01 AM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] User-defined types -- in Andl
On 6/9/15, david
Language - andl.org
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Dominique
Devienne
Sent: Tuesday, 9 June 2015 9:57 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] User-defined
-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org] On Behalf Of
david at andl.org
Sent: Tuesday, 9 June 2015 9:51 PM
To: 'General Discussion of SQLite Database'
Subject: Re: [sqlite] User-defined types -- in Andl
Thank you. Exactly so. One of the problems with this kind of project is
finding 'good enough
> On Jun 9, 2015, at 2:53 PM, Jean-Christophe Deschamps
> wrote:
>
> Most probably! I can imagine that you don't encounter such style in common
> business-like environments.
Just for ?corporate' fun: analytic recursive common table expression - oh, my?
with
Clock( start_at, end_at,
On 6/9/15, david at andl.org wrote:
> I don't remember the last time I saw SQL like this. Understanding it
> might be the challenge...
I'll be giving a talk on CTEs this Saturday at the Southeastern
Linuxfest (http://www.southeastlinuxfest.org/) during which I will
explain and demonstrate how to
] User-defined types -- in Andl
At 08:27 09/06/2015, you wrote:
>Andl is at a slightly higher level than SQL for writing simple queries.
>Where it shines is writing complex queries that involve user-defined
>types, custom transformations and custom aggregations. For complex
&g
Language - andl.org
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Nelson,
Erik - 2
Sent: Monday, 8 June 2015 11:51 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] User-defined types
-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Eduardo
Morras
Sent: Tuesday, 9 June 2015 4:02 AM
To: sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] User-defined types -- in Andl
On Mon, 8 Jun 2015 15:28:11 +1000
wrote:
> Thanks for pointing it out, but I knew that the best
At 13:50 09/06/2015, you wrote:
>BTW I don't remember the last time I saw SQL like this. Understanding it
>might be the challenge
`---
Most probably! I can imagine that you don't encounter such style in
common business-like environments.
Take your time, this SQL piece is clearly beyond
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 1:50 PM, wrote:
> Thank you. Exactly so. One of the problems with this kind of project is
> finding 'good enough' challenges to tackle.
>
See also from the CTE doc:
- https://www.sqlite.org/lang_with.html#sudoku
- https://www.sqlite.org/lang_with.html#mandelbrot
Thanks,
At 08:27 09/06/2015, you wrote:
>Andl is at a slightly higher level than SQL for writing simple queries.
>Where it shines is writing complex queries that involve user-defined
>types,
>custom transformations and custom aggregations. For complex relational
>operations there is nothing I know
I hope you do try it. I'm looking for feedback.
Sorry about the C#. Problem is, I'm way more productive in C# than any other
language. C/C++ is just too slow to get things done and Java is still lagging.
It would have taken far longer to do the SQLite C interface without .NET
interop (JNI is
On Mon, 8 Jun 2015 15:28:11 +1000
wrote:
> Thanks for pointing it out, but I knew that the best way to show off a
> language is with examples. That's why there are nine sample Andl
> scripts comprising dozens of individual examples in the Samples
> folder. My guess is if that you're asking me to
Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Simon
Slavin
Sent: Monday, 8 June 2015 12:26 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] User-defined types -- in Andl
On 8 Jun 2015, at 3:14am
[mailto:sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Simon
Slavin
Sent: Monday, 8 June 2015 12:23 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] User-defined types -- in Andl
On 8 Jun 2015, at 3:12am, wrote:
> Is there a PDF? No, but that's a good idea. Did you ch
david at andl.org wrote on Monday, June 08, 2015 9:23 AM
>
> Ultimately, I don't think it will really matter, because the role of
> Andl is to be platform independent. Do you care what your SQL product
> is written in?
>
Absolutely. I wouldn't be using SQLite if it wasn't C/C++, and I suspect
On 8 Jun 2015, at 6:28am, wrote:
> Thanks for pointing it out, but I knew that the best way to show off a
> language is with examples. That's why there are nine sample Andl scripts
> comprising dozens of individual examples in the Samples folder. My guess is
> if that you're asking me to write
[mailto:sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Simon
Slavin
Sent: Monday, 8 June 2015 4:00 AM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] User-defined types -- in Andl
On 7 Jun 2015, at 6:51pm, Scott Doctor wrote:
> Do you have a PDF that explains the langu
...@mailinglists.sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Scott
Doctor
Sent: Monday, 8 June 2015 3:52 AM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] User-defined types -- in Andl
Do you have a PDF that explains the language?
My opinion
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 4:17 AM, wrote:
> I've been reading this thread with great interest. It parallels the project
> I've been working on: Andl.
>
> Andl is A New Database Language.
>
> Andl does what SQL does, but it is not SQL. Andl has been developed as a
> fully featured database
Any properly written documentation on any subject always begins with an
executive summary (no more than a few pages), an overview (usually a
dozen more pages), then gets into the nitty gritty.
Consider if I want you to write a paragraph in Egyptian Hieroglyphics.
So I provide you with a few
On 8 Jun 2015, at 3:14am, wrote:
> I suggest you just read the samples off GitHub. They cover the entire
> language. Download the binary, run them and you see what they do.
Sorry but no. You have it reversed. Your code isn't going to touch my
computer unless you have already convinced me
On 8 Jun 2015, at 3:12am, wrote:
> Is there a PDF? No, but that's a good idea. Did you check out the samples?
> They cover the entire language, and I could turn those into a PDF much
> faster than a real language. It would take about a month to write a decent
> tutorial and reference, but that
I've been reading this thread with great interest. It parallels the project
I've been working on: Andl.
Andl is A New Database Language.
Andl does what SQL does, but it is not SQL. Andl has been developed as a
fully featured database programming language following the principles set
out by Date
This is the challenge that I accept, with Andl.
SQL has been astonishingly successful, partly because of sound foundations
and partly because it's a monopoly. It's not a bad language, but on the
other hand it many ways it's not a language at all. Up until the 1992
version and including the SQLite
On 7 Jun 2015, at 6:51pm, Scott Doctor wrote:
> Do you have a PDF that explains the language?
There are plenty of blog entries which explain the language. I spent more time
looking for some examples (I understand better from examples) and eventually
found one.
Simon.
So we are supposed to learn this new language by osmosis?
Scott Doctor
scott at scottdoctor.com
On 6/7/2015 11:00 AM, Simon Slavin wrote:
> On 7 Jun 2015, at 6:51pm, Scott Doctor wrote:
>
>> Do you have a PDF that explains the language?
> There are plenty of blog entries which
Do you have a PDF that explains the language?
My opinion is that I have seen many languages come and go. Consider
general programing languages. C is far superior to just about any
language available. In fact the underlying code for most languages is
written in C. So the question becomes, why
32 matches
Mail list logo
