Shane Harrelson wrote:
>
>It wasn't a loss of precision, it was mearly a display issue. The Windows
>ActiveTCL 8.5
>distribution might display the floating point value as "5.4e-018" while the
>"unix"
>TCL 8.5 version would display "5.4e-18" (or something similar). There's
>probably
>an option
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Michael Schlenker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shane Harrelson schrieb:
> > Sorry for the late reply. I use both the ActiveTCL and the Cygwin
> > distributions for testing on Windows.
> > It should be noted that both versions have limitations that will cause
> >
Shane Harrelson schrieb:
> Sorry for the late reply. I use both the ActiveTCL and the Cygwin
> distributions for testing on Windows.
> It should be noted that both versions have limitations that will cause
> "false positives" in the test suite.
>
> Be on the look out especially for problems
Sorry for the late reply. I use both the ActiveTCL and the Cygwin
distributions for testing on Windows.
It should be noted that both versions have limitations that will cause
"false positives" in the test suite.
Be on the look out especially for problems with 64-integers and floating
point
Brown, Daniel wrote:
> Good afternoon list,
>
> If I would like to use the TCL based tests on my version of SQLite on
> Windows XP what would be the recommend TCL distribution to use? Would
> ActiveTCL (http://tinyurl.com/5wl6uv) be compatible with the SQLite TCL
> scripts on Windows XP?
>
>
Good afternoon list,
If I would like to use the TCL based tests on my version of SQLite on
Windows XP what would be the recommend TCL distribution to use? Would
ActiveTCL (http://tinyurl.com/5wl6uv) be compatible with the SQLite TCL
scripts on Windows XP?
Cheers,
Daniel Brown | Software
6 matches
Mail list logo
