Hello,
On 2017-04-19 19:31, Dan Kennedy wrote:
If you compile the code below with gcc 7.0.1:
gcc code.c -fsantitize=address -o tst
and then run:
./tst 2
Does the sanitizer make the same complaint?
[...]
/**/
[...]
switch( a ){
On 2017-04-19 19:31, Dan Kennedy wrote:
On 04/18/2017 07:12 PM, Vitti wrote:
In my opinion this is probably due to erroneous usage of variable res
in the branches
of the huge switch in sqlite3VdbeExec
What's wrong with ``{ int res; res = 0; }''? The sanitizer should alert
in the following
On 04/18/2017 07:12 PM, Vitti wrote:
Hi there, I just downloaded version 3.18 and after compiling it with
the following command
gcc shell.c sqlite3.c -g -fsanitize=address -DSQLITE_DEBUG -o sqlite
-ldl -pthread
Hi,
Thanks for reporting this. I haven't been able to reproduce it with any
of
Hi there, I just downloaded version 3.18 and after compiling it with
the following command
gcc shell.c sqlite3.c -g -fsanitize=address -DSQLITE_DEBUG -o sqlite
-ldl -pthread
running sqlite command
.selftest --init
I get a sanitizer error message.
In my opinion this is probably due to erroneous
4 matches
Mail list logo
