Hello,
I've developed an application that has very high concurrency. In my
initial testing we used SQLite 3 from python, but we experienced too
many locks and the database always fell behind. We moved to MySQL,
which handles the concurrency better, but there was a substantial
increase in IO.
We are using SQLite for indexing a huge number (i.e., 100 million to 1
billion) of key pairs
that are represented by an 88-byte key. We are using a single table with a
very large number of rows (one for each data chunk), and two columns.
The table has two columns. One is of type ³text² and the
On Jun 24, 2009, at 3:21 PM, Matthew O'Keefe wrote:
> disks accesses to (a) find, and (b) add a chunk, grows larger and
> larger. We’ve tested up to 20 million chunks represented in the
> table: as expected performance exponentially decreases as the number
> of table entries grows.
Did
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 14:21 +0200, Martin.Engelschalk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> type names do not matter in sqlite, see http://www.sqlite.org/datatype3.html
>
> Martin
>
Yes, I see. Thank you:)
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Daniel Watrous wrote:
> I've developed an application that has very high concurrency. In my
> initial testing we used SQLite 3 from python, but we experienced too
> many locks and the database always fell behind.
What precisely is the nature of the concurrency? Are you opening
multiple
Pavel Ivanov wrote:
> Could you explain why this scenario doesn't cause infinite call cycle
> of the trigger by itself? Is there some protection in SQLite which
> breaks such cycles?
SQLite doesn't support recursive triggers: a trigger cannot call itself,
directly or indirectly. SQLite keeps
Hi all!
Anyone being able to give me some pointers on how to compile SQLite3
into dependency-free .obj's on Windows?
The only reason for this is to import it into Delphi, and dependencies
are driving me crazy...
It doesn't matter if You give me an example (or maybe project source(s))
in Borland
One approach might be to split the big, monolithic table into some number of
hash buckets, where each 'bucket' is separate table. When doing a search, the
program calculates the hash and accesses reads only the bucket that is needed.
This approach also has the potential for allowing multiple
VIADANA, Italy (June 24, 2009) - SQLabs is proud to announce today the
worldwide availability of SQLiteManager 3.0, the most powerful sqlite
database manager tool for MacOS X and Windows.
SQLiteManager is a "next generation" GUI database manager for sqlite
databases. It combines an
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Matthew
O'Keefe wrote:
>
>
> We are using SQLite for indexing a huge number (i.e., 100 million to 1
> billion) of key pairs
> that are represented by an 88-byte key. We are using a single table with a
> very large number of rows (one for
Well, tomorrow I'm going to try if the option clean works. At this moment I
can't figure out how to do that because my application is under development
and I'm using the eclipse launcher ( Run Configurations). I'm not using
any executable file.
I have to find the way to pass to the launcher
> "PK" == P Kishor writes:
>> As expected, as the table grows, the underlying B-tree
>> implementation for SQLite means that the number of disks accesses
>> to (a) find, and (b) add a chunk, grows larger and larger. We¹ve
>> tested up to 20 million chunks represented in the table: as
>>
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:36 PM, David Fletcher wrote:
>
>> "PK" == P Kishor writes:
>
>>> As expected, as the table grows, the underlying B-tree
>>> implementation for SQLite means that the number of disks accesses
>>> to (a) find, and (b) add a chunk, grows larger and
On 25 Jun 2009, at 5:43pm, P Kishor wrote:
> heck! Do two comparisons -- SQLite v. BerkeleyDB v. Tokyo Cabinet.
>
> Nothing like thorough testing for the purpose of science. :-)
Yes, there is: keeping to departmental budget and project deadlines.
(I know, the argument is that the research will
Along the same lines, the buckets could be created in their own unique Sqlite
Db, thus improving concurrency as well!!!
--- On Thu, 6/25/09, Douglas E. Fajardo wrote:
> From: Douglas E. Fajardo
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] very large SQLite tables
> To:
I have an embedded Linux ARM target and wish to run sqlite on it. I
successfully cross-compiled sqlite-3.6.15 on my Ubuntu x86 host, and now I'm
ready to install sqlite3, its libraries, and headers on my target system.
I originally tried compiling sqlite on my embedded target system. Because
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Ben Atkinson wrote:
>
> I have an embedded Linux ARM target and wish to run sqlite on it. I
> successfully cross-compiled sqlite-3.6.15 on my Ubuntu x86 host, and now I'm
> ready to install sqlite3, its libraries, and headers on my target
On Jun 25, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Ben Atkinson wrote:
>
> I have an embedded Linux ARM target and wish to run sqlite on it. I
> successfully cross-compiled sqlite-3.6.15 on my Ubuntu x86 host, and
> now I'm ready to install sqlite3, its libraries, and headers on my
> target system.
>
> I
> On Jun 25, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Ben Atkinson wrote:
>>
>> I have an embedded Linux ARM target and wish to run sqlite on it. I
>> successfully cross-compiled sqlite-3.6.15 on my Ubuntu x86 host, and
>> now I'm ready to install sqlite3, its libraries, and headers on my
>> target system.
>>
On Jun 25, 2009, at 5:07 PM, Ben Atkinson wrote:
>
> On Jun 25, 2009, at 4:27 PM, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>> What are you trying to install? The command-line shell? A shared
>> library? If the latter, why do you need or want a shared library on
>> your embedded system. Are aware that the
20 matches
Mail list logo