Re: [sqlite] getting rid of dirty SQLITE_BUSY workaround

On Sun, Mar 13, 2005, Jan-Eric Duden wrote: > The issue 1159 was marked as "not_a_bug". > So is there a misunderstanding? > Maybe. I tried hard to explain my point of view. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cable & Wireless

Re: [sqlite] getting rid of dirty SQLITE_BUSY workaround

Re, this solution rocks. Thanks a lot! On Sun, Mar 13, 2005, D. Richard Hipp wrote: > On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 16:49 -0500, D. Richard Hipp wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 21:56 +0100, Thomas Lotterer wrote: > > > > > I cannot believe it is normal behavior of a database a

[sqlite] getting rid of dirty SQLITE_BUSY workaround

I've created an application that makes use of SQLite3. Occasionally, multiple instances of that application run at the same time and need to write to the database simultaneously. When I decided to use SQLite I was under the impression that the support for multiple writers doing massive parallel