Re: [sqlite] Speed comparison

I believe there is, it would be highly interesting. Please keep me and others posted, and let me and all others know the results of the test/-s! (Disclaimer: I'm in no way a part of the SQLite developer team, solely a ml member.) Kind regards, Mikael 2011/6/8 Cecil Westerhof

Re: [sqlite] Speed comparison

There is no need for new speed comparisons? 2011/6/6 Cecil Westerhof : > I saw that there is the need for a speed comparison. I have MySQL > (5.1.53) installed (and when necessary I could install PostgreSQL). > Would it be interesting if I made those tests? If yes, what is

[sqlite] Speed comparison

I saw that there is the need for a speed comparison. I have MySQL (5.1.53) installed (and when necessary I could install PostgreSQL). Would it be interesting if I made those tests? If yes, what is the correct way to do it? I am not using the most recent version (3.7.5), but I suppose that this

[sqlite] Speed comparison (was: [sqlite] Lock files....)

b.bum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > SQLite3 produces smaller data files thats true, > and is faster, in general, than did SQLite2. but this is not my experience. In my small applications (about 20 records) inserting and searching with SQLite 3.0 is slower than SQLite 2.8 (about 25%).