...oopss.. I supposed it was a fault of mine. Thanks for the support and the
help.
Just two points:
1. the "PRAGMA writable_schema=ON" is not described in the "official"
documentation for the PRAGMA syntax
2. does this mean that if I create an invalid view in the database, the
entire database
Hi folks!
After having UPDATE and INSERT on a view working, I'd also like to DELETE
FROM a view. I have the following tables and a view:
---
create table dbapp_tablenames (
tablenameID integer primary key,
tablename text not null unique on conflict ignore
);
create table
I have trouble to move up node on sqlite
on mysql i write:
UPDATE SET rgt = rgt + IF(rgt<%1,%2,-%3)
on sqlite i must rewrite query to
UPDATE SET rgt = (SELECT CASE WHEN (rgt < %1) THEN rgt + %2 ELSE rgt + -%3
END)
is here a way to create a trigger or similar on sqlite to support
IF(expression,int
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have trouble to move up node on sqlite
> on mysql i write:
> UPDATE SET rgt = rgt + IF(rgt<%1,%2,-%3)
> on sqlite i must rewrite query to
> UPDATE SET rgt = (SELECT CASE WHEN (rgt < %1) THEN rgt + %2 ELSE rgt
> + -%3 END)
You don't
"Fabiano Sidler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> create trigger dbapp_delete instead of delete on dbapp begin
> delete from dbapp_tablefields where tablenameID=(
> select tablenameID from dbapp_tablenames
> where tablename=old.tablename
> and
Igor Tandetnik wrote:
>
> You don't need SELECT keyword here. You could also get closer to the
> original statement with
>
> UPDATE tableName SET rgt = rgt + (CASE WHEN (rgt < %1) THEN %2 ELSE -%3
> END);
>
This also has the advantage that it is standard SQL and therefore
portable to many
Starting yesterday afternoon we seemed to experience some serious
delays in mailing list distribution. It has been difficult to
determine what the actual cause is, as there has been no configuration
changes in either the mailing list of mail server.
It *appears* as if this may have been a
I am trying to enable the REGEXP operator. I have read on the forums that
you must use the sqlite3_create_function. I would like to use the boost
regular expressions library under the hood. Question is, does anyone have
an example using this function (sqlite3_create_function) to override
Jason Tudor wrote:
> I am trying to enable the REGEXP operator. I have read on the forums that
> you must use the sqlite3_create_function. I would like to use the boost
> regular expressions library under the hood. Question is, does anyone have
> an example using this function
Greetings!
I must be doing something wrong. I've got a simple table with three
columns, a key column, a value column and a timestamp column. There
are 357,000 rows. The timestamps are stored as floating-point numbers
(Julian dates), and the other two fields contain integers. I open the
table,
Hey all,
Mozilla has recently upgraded to sqlite 3.5.7, and we've suddenly
gotten a lot of crashes. The mozilla bug report is here:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424163
We haven't looked into it to much, but I figured I'd point it out to
so you were aware of it.
Cheers,
Shawn
Greetings!
I must be doing something wrong. I've got a simple table with three
columns, a key column, a value column and a timestamp column. There
are 357,000 rows. The timestamps are stored as floating-point numbers
(Julian dates), and the other two fields contain integers. I open the
table,
"Shawn Wilsher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Mozilla has recently upgraded to sqlite 3.5.7, and we've suddenly
> gotten a lot of crashes. The mozilla bug report is here:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424163
>
> We haven't looked into it to much, but I figured I'd
> Any additional information you can send, such as the size of
> the database file at the point of failure, or the exact line
> on which the problem occurs, will be appreciated. (I know the
> bug report gives a line-number, but line numbers shift from
> one amalgamation to another, and I
On Mar 20, 2008, at 10:38 PM, Jason Tudor wrote:
> I am trying to enable the REGEXP operator. I have read on the
> forums that
> you must use the sqlite3_create_function. I would like to use the
> boost
> regular expressions library under the hood. Question is, does
> anyone have
> an
It might be helpful to include the version of sqlite.
Have you run your code through a memory analysis routine such as valgrind, to
validate that the leak is not occuring in your application code?
HTH,
Ken
Rob Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Greetings!
I must be doing something wrong.
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:23:23 +0100, you wrote:
>...oopss.. I supposed it was a fault of mine.
>Thanks for the support and the help.
>
>Just two points:
>
>1. the "PRAGMA writable_schema=ON" is not described in
>the "official" documentation for the PRAGMA syntax
It's not a supported PRAGMA. In
Kees Nuyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I know I can't create an invalid view,
> >because SQLite refuses to create it,
> >but this seems a problem to me... could SQLite just open the database, and
> >complain only on the invalid views (i.e. for instance when I open the view
> >to query the data
do_test alter2-2.1 {
execsql {
CREATE TABLE abc2(a, b, c);
INSERT INTO abc2 VALUES(1, 2, 10);
INSERT INTO abc2 VALUES(3, 4, NULL);
INSERT INTO abc2 VALUES(5, 6, NULL);
CREATE VIEW abc2_v AS SELECT *
> sqlite> CREATE TABLE abc2(a, b, c);
>
> sqlite> CREATE VIEW abc2_v AS SELECT * FROM abc2;
> sqlite> SELECT * FROM abc2_v;
>
> sqlite> ALTER TABLE abc2 ADD COLUMN d;
>
>
> I would expect the view to give 4 columns after the
Hello,
I am trying to use SQLite on a MicroBlaze processor running uClinux using the
petalogix toolchain. I can open an in-memory database, but when I try to open a
file database the library can't open the file. Internally, the open call
returns 22 - invalid argument. The application is
If I use two columns for a key (primary or separate index) and query
just on the first column component will I always get back the first
match in a set. For example.
-
create table mytable ( clm1 text collate nocase, clm2 text collate nocase,
constraint mycs1 primary key( clm1, clm2 ) );
No, use ORDER BY
Neville Franks wrote:
> If I use two columns for a key (primary or separate index) and query
> just on the first column component will I always get back the first
> match in a set. For example.
>
> -
> create table mytable ( clm1 text collate nocase, clm2 text collate
Let me rephrase the question slightly. If I do
select * from table where clm1='def';
then step through the results will I see all rows that include 'def'.
The answer must be yes. The only issue is what order they will be in.
If I want them ordered by clm2 then yes I'd probably need use ORDER
In trying to break my code with the seinfeld database examples, I found this.
SELECT f.name as food, e1.name, e1.season, e2.name, e2.season FROM episodes e1,
foods_episodes fe1, foods f, episodes e2, foods_episodes fe2
Why does this put SQLite into an endless loop?
(I am not using the shell tool,
On 3/21/08, Derek Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In trying to break my code with the seinfeld database examples, I found this.
Derek,
You are going to get much better help from the list, not to mention
that you will probably get further with your "code breaking," if you
provide some more
26 matches
Mail list logo
