Re: [sqlite] Firefox 3 and the SQLite "bug"

2008-05-22 Thread Shawn Wilsher
Thanks! I've posted that information in the bug. Cheers, Shawn On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 4:09 PM, D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On May 22, 2008, at 9:40 AM, Shawn Wilsher wrote: > >> It was mentioned in the bug that opening the file with the O_SYNC flag >> would no longer

Re: [sqlite] Firefox 3 and the SQLite "bug"

2008-05-22 Thread D. Richard Hipp
On May 22, 2008, at 9:40 AM, Shawn Wilsher wrote: > It was mentioned in the bug that opening the file with the O_SYNC flag > would no longer require fsyncs. Has this been looked into before by > sqlite? > I have a prepared a version of SQLite that uses O_SYNC on the main database file and

Re: [sqlite] Firefox 3 and the SQLite "bug"

2008-05-22 Thread D. Richard Hipp
On May 22, 2008, at 9:40 AM, Shawn Wilsher wrote: > It was mentioned in the bug that opening the file with the O_SYNC flag > would no longer require fsyncs. Has this been looked into before by > sqlite? > I don't think this would work well. The O_SYNC flag causes each write() system call to

Re: [sqlite] Firefox 3 and the SQLite "bug"

2008-05-22 Thread Shawn Wilsher
It was mentioned in the bug that opening the file with the O_SYNC flag would no longer require fsyncs. Has this been looked into before by sqlite? Cheers, Shawn ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org

Re: [sqlite] Firefox 3 and the SQLite "bug"

2008-05-22 Thread D. Richard Hipp
On May 22, 2008, at 7:20 AM, Russell Leighton wrote: > > Digg has an article where it is said that the new Firefox "locks" up > under Linux due to SQLite: > > http://digg.com/linux_unix/ > Firefox_3_has_system_killing_performance_problem_for_Linux > > Bug here: > >