Re: [sqlite] Network concurrency question

2008-09-25 Thread Jeffrey Becker
The long and short of it is that SQLite uses the os File-Locking APIs for concurrency. Network File systems vary wildly in the reliability of their implementations of these APIs. If you already have a server application why not simply force all database access through that? On Thu, Sep 25, 2008

Re: [sqlite] Network concurrency question

2008-09-25 Thread Gerry Snyder
Darrell Lee wrote: >> >> > Here is my situation: the maximum number of clients that would be > reading the SQLite database is 6, of that 6 the maximum number of > clients that might be trying to write to the SQLite db is 3. In you > guys experience, on a scale of 1-10 , 10 being the

Re: [sqlite] Network concurrency question

2008-09-25 Thread Darrell Lee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I would like to use SQLite from a network share. I would like to create a > server app that would do all of the writing to the database except for > certain tables, one table per client,the clients would write to their own > table only. The client drops it's

Re: [sqlite] Network concurrency question

2008-09-16 Thread Enrique Ramirez
> Another question I have is do I understand correctly that an SQLite > database, on a network share, has no problems with many readers, the > problem starts with many writers. Is this correct? > > Thanks, > TD Yes, you'll have problems with many writers since each network file system

Re: [sqlite] Network concurrency question

2008-09-16 Thread Jay A. Kreibich
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:49:48PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] scratched on the wall: > I would like to use SQLite from a network share. I would like to create a > server app that would do all of the writing to the database except for > certain tables, one table per client,the clients would write