On 19 Sep 2016, at 2:52am, Keith Medcalf wrote:
> That is to say there is no difference between a block device (such as a
> physical hard disk) attached to the computer via a 1 foot SCSI cable and an
> iSCSI LUN where the iSCSI block device is located on a different
No database server product of which I am aware will "work" properly when the
database resides on a remote filesystem. There is a *vast* difference between
a "remote file system" and a "local file system on a remote block device".
There is no difference between a "remote block device" known as
"snapshotable" or not, DBs are accessed from the local file system, not
from a network where another OS has control of the file system.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * R. Smith:
>
> > Enterprise DBs have servers on the same machine as the Files
* R. Smith:
> Enterprise DBs have servers on the same machine as the Files they
> access, they do not actually use the network file-system to access the
> DB data-files over the network from multiple clients, or even servers
> (unless the DBs are partitioned so and ONLY accessed by the single
>
4 matches
Mail list logo