That looks good to me.
I attached a patch for 2171, will try to get it tested ASAP.
On 12/03/2008, at 7:13 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I've updated the Squid-2.7 release notes. I'd like to release
Squid-2.7.STABLE1
this weekend. Its possible my Bugzilla searches haven't turned up
all of the
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 14:12 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
As it stands we can call one or the other an up/down and leave things as-is.
I'm minded to call 2.6 a 'down' of 3.0 and 3.0/2.7/2.6 downs of 3.1. I
have not looked closely at the update script to see if thats right though.
As I said I
On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 22:43 +0100, Guido Serassio wrote:
This file comes from the original work of Romeo Anghelache.
After some search, I have found the original one from Apache 1.3:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/src/os/win32/readdir.c?view=markup
If I remember
Hi all,
Alex Rousskov wrote:
Hello,
This email describes upcoming changes in the Squid3 robustness
project. The Squid3 robustness project has two related goals:
...
The current design has been disculeassed at the London meeting, and a few
adjustments were requested. This
Hi Henrik,
At 12:59 13/03/2008, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 22:43 +0100, Guido Serassio wrote:
This file comes from the original work of Romeo Anghelache.
After some search, I have found the original one from Apache 1.3:
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 20:48 +0100, Guido Serassio wrote:
Too much times something like this is happened:
- Update from CVS of my work dir
- Fix of build problems
- Commit of fixes
- Finished the little time that I have available for development,
usually during weekend
- Hope to do some
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 20:48 +0100, Guido Serassio wrote:
Too much times something like this is happened:
- Update from CVS of my work dir
- Fix of build problems
- Commit of fixes
- Finished the little time that I have available for development,
usually during weekend
- Hope to do some
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 13:49 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2186
--- Comment #9 from Bernhard Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-13 13:49:20
---
Seems to work now, thanks. Applied without changes to BZR
Berni,
Are you talking about some
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 21:15 +0200, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
1. The assert() code will not throw exceptions by default. It will
continue to call abort() as before. To enable the robustness feature, a
squid.conf option will need to be set. (In the future, that option may
contain a date
Hi Alex,
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2186
--- Comment #9 from Bernhard Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-13 13:49:20
---
Seems to work now, thanks. Applied without changes to BZR
Are you talking about some private bzr branch that you are
maintaining? Or did I stop
Has anyone actually committed to the bzr tree? I haven't seen any commit
messages.
adrian
Adrian Chadd wrote:
Has anyone actually committed to the bzr tree? I haven't seen any commit
messages.
Henrik and Robert committed the release script updates before messages
were done. Since Robert said the commit messages were supposed to be
done I don't think anyone has.
Amos
--
Please
Amos Jeffries wrote:
Adrian Chadd wrote:
Has anyone actually committed to the bzr tree? I haven't seen any commit
messages.
Henrik and Robert committed the release script updates before messages
were done. Since Robert said the commit messages were supposed to be
done I don't think anyone
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 12:34 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Has anyone actually committed to the bzr tree? I haven't seen any commit
messages.
I have not committed or seen any messages either. I still need to find
and read the instructions :-(
Commit messages are still being sent to [EMAIL
14 matches
Mail list logo
