tor 2007-04-12 klockan 23:05 -0600 skrev Alex Rousskov:
I think that cppunit should be removed from the source tree (especially
if it is so easy to install and is not for end-users anyway). This step
should not depend on the make check discussion outcome.
We all agree I think.
I think
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 09:37 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
That, and deciding on the eventual layout - do we leave static
content under www/static/ (which means the distribution URLs have
changed) or do we create a static.squid-cache.org virtual server
for all the static stuff and, for now, use
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 14:29 +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
I think you should decide to either:
- keep cppunit in the source tree
or
- have make check fail when its not installed.
I suggest we could:
- not bundle cppunit
- have make check fail if it doesn't detect it
- create a new target
Alex Rousskov wrote:
Hi there,
I went through the remaining Squid3 non-enhancement bug reports
targeted for 3.0. For most bugs, I was able to close or comment in the
bugzilla. The following bugs are special because the questions did not
seem appropriate for bugzilla. Please review.
Alex Rousskov wrote:
Hi there,
I went through the remaining Squid3 non-enhancement bug reports
targeted for 3.0. For most bugs, I was able to close or comment in the
bugzilla. The following bugs are special because the questions did not
seem appropriate for bugzilla. Please review.
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 03:27 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Here is the patch for that additional ICAP problem that came to light
testing cppunit removal.
Committed.
Thank you,
Alex.
