Re: [squid-users] CentOS6 and squid34 package ...

2017-05-25 Thread Mike
Walter, what I've found is when compiling to squid 3.5.x and higher, the compile options change. Also remember that many of the options that were available with 3.1.x are depreciated and likely will not work with 3.4.x and higher. The other issue is that squid is only supposed to be handling

Re: [squid-users] CentOS6 and squid34 package ...

2017-05-25 Thread Walter H.
On 25.05.2017 12:50, Amos Jeffries wrote: On 25/05/17 20:19, Walter H. wrote: Hello what is the essential difference between the default squid package and this squid34 package, Run "squid -v" to find out if there are any build options different. Usually its just two alternative versions

Re: [squid-users] SSL bump, SSL intercept, explicit, secure proxy, what is it called?

2017-05-25 Thread j m
This doesn't seem to have the SSL option like Foxyproxy does.  From: Marcus Kool To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 8:18 AM Subject: Re: [squid-users] SSL bump, SSL intercept, explicit, secure proxy, what is it called?

Re: [squid-users] SSL bump, SSL intercept, explicit, secure proxy, what is it called?

2017-05-25 Thread Marcus Kool
If you use foxyproxy for firefox, you can use switchysharp for Chrome. Marcus On 25/05/17 09:00, j m wrote: Thought I'd try getting this to work in Chrome too. NOTHING I try makes it work in Chrome. Isn't running this from the Windows command line supposed to work? chrome

Re: [squid-users] SSL bump, SSL intercept, explicit, secure proxy, what is it called?

2017-05-25 Thread j m
Thought I'd try getting this to work in Chrome too.  NOTHING I try makes it work in Chrome.  Isn't running this from the Windows command line supposed to work? chrome --proxy-server=https://mydomain:myport When I do this, it runs Chrome, but it's still not going through the proxy despite

Re: [squid-users] Logs from traffic that don't belong to either whitelist or blacklist

2017-05-25 Thread Walter H.
On 25.05.2017 11:25, Amos Jeffries wrote: On 25/05/17 19:51, Miguel Barbero wrote: Good morning, We have a special requirement and we are not sure whether it's possible to accomplish. We have defined a whitelist and a blacklist on our Squid. Its behaviour is as usual and how it could

Re: [squid-users] SSL bump, SSL intercept, explicit, secure proxy, what is it called?

2017-05-25 Thread j m
Yay!  It works!  I got the Firefox addon Foxyproxy and checked the little SSL box, and it works perfectly.  How frustrating is it that Firefox and Chrome don't have this as an easy box to check?  They say it will cause confusion, but how many people even use a proxy to begin with?

Re: [squid-users] CentOS6 and squid34 package ...

2017-05-25 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 25/05/17 20:19, Walter H. wrote: Hello what is the essential difference between the default squid package and this squid34 package, Run "squid -v" to find out if there are any build options different. Usually its just two alternative versions from the vendor. as I have problems using

Re: [squid-users] Logs from traffic that don't belong to either whitelist or blacklist

2017-05-25 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 25/05/17 19:51, Miguel Barbero wrote: Good morning, We have a special requirement and we are not sure whether it's possible to accomplish. We have defined a whitelist and a blacklist on our Squid. Its behaviour is as usual and how it could expect. All the traffic less blacklist is

Re: [squid-users] Logs from traffic that don't belong to either whitelist or blacklist

2017-05-25 Thread Walter H.
On 25.05.2017 09:51, Miguel Barbero wrote: Good morning, We have a special requirement and we are not sure whether it's possible to accomplish. We have defined a whitelist and a blacklist on our Squid. Its behaviour is as usual and how it could expect. All the traffic less blacklist is

[squid-users] CentOS6 and squid34 package ...

2017-05-25 Thread Walter H.
Hello what is the essential difference between the default squid package and this squid34 package, as I have problems using this squid34 package for FTP connections; there are no shown icons, when going to e.g. ftp://ftp.adobe.com/ when I tell the browser to show the image then I get this

[squid-users] Logs from traffic that don't belong to either whitelist or blacklist

2017-05-25 Thread Miguel Barbero
Good morning, We have a special requirement and we are not sure whether it's possible to accomplish. We have defined a whitelist and a blacklist on our Squid. Its behaviour is as usual and how it could expect. All the traffic less blacklist is passed however we are interested to get an alert