[squid-users] need some information about FD for squid on redhat 9

2007-08-05 Thread squid learner
I am using redhat9.0 and squid STABLE14 the default FD 1024 So did increase in FD increase performance of my cache And what is the way of changing FD and what is best value to change please advice thankyou

Re: [squid-users] need some information about FD for squid on redhat 9

2007-08-05 Thread Amos Jeffries
squid learner wrote: I am using redhat9.0 and squid STABLE14 the default FD 1024 So did increase in FD increase performance of my cache And what is the way of changing FD and what is best value to change At compile time there is a configure option --with-filedescriptors=NUMBER (or if not

Re: [squid-users] forward and reverse proxy - the difference

2007-08-05 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 26.07.07 09:30, Ming-Ching Tiew wrote: Believe it or not, I got problem understanding the basics. What's the difference between forward and reverse proxy. When I read the article, http://jayant7k.blogspot.com/2006/10/reverse-proxy-using-squid.html When I read paragraph 3,4 5, I think

Re: [squid-users] Security Issue with Squid (help!)

2007-08-05 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 26.07.07 12:10, Reid wrote: This morning while using squid as a proxy, whenever I went to a popular website (e.g. Hotmail, Amazon), I noticed my Internet Explorer browser warning me about cookies from restricted sites. The list of sites was weird stuff like

Re: [squid-users] Regular Expression

2007-08-05 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 02.08.07 11:30, Enrico Popp wrote: I have an problem with regular expression in squidGuard. I'm using the following regex [EMAIL PROTECTED]://www.main.example.org/(.+)@http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] where did you get the regex? Now the problem consists that http://example.org contain no

[squid-users] Problem with Sibling

2007-08-05 Thread Shekhar Gupta
All, I have configured 4 proxy to work as sibling relation and specified the ICP port as 3130 , however when i try to do a telnet it always fails , so i think the cache performance is not getting optimized . Any clue for this ? Regards, Shekhar