On 10/03/2013 10:45 PM, Andreas Westvik wrote:
So what kind of format do I have now then?
Do you have any examples?
You've got dstdom_regex in the line that includes the list file, so
it's processing it through regex for every entry, and none of them need to.
Change the entries in the file
Hello, previous version 2.x worked fine.
OS: Centos 6.3, kinit pass fine - Authenticated to Kerberos v5
When i upgraded to 3.1.10 i got error in cache.log
authenticateNegotiateHandleReply: Error validating user via Negotiate. Error
returned 'BH gss_acquire_cred() failed: Unspecified GSS
* Alex Rousskov rouss...@measurement-factory.com:
On 03/08/2013 08:11 AM, Adam W. Dace wrote:
Does anyone have a simple example configuration for running Squid
3.3.2 with multiple workers?
You can just add workers 2 to squid.conf.default.
That's really all?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Hi,
Integrating squid box with rukus access point and captiive portal.
we have wifi users in network and we have captive portal for them.
For wifi, we are using ruckus access point and in there we configure
that to forward web traffic to squid box and in squid box we configure
url_rewrite,
I'm still confused about squid's behavior in 3.2.7 concerning
credentials-caching and the order of the http_access-directive.
Does someone has an explanation for squids behavior (look the
questions in this post..) and does squid even cache the
negotiate-credentials??
Many thanks.
Tom
On Thu,
Hello,
After many years with squid as a proxy-cache combined with the proxy.pac or
WPAD client configurations, we are considering to use squid as a proxy with
interception (WCCP2) on our whole university site.
The reason essentially lies on complaints from users with their browsers
(sorry for the slow answer, an over-eager spam filter swallowed this msg).
In wireshark, the server name sent in the ticket is correct
(proxy.example.com) , encryption is rc4-hmac and knvo=5.
This is the same kvno as seen in klist -ekt /etc/krb5.keytab (with
des-cbc-crc, des-cbc-md5,
I've updated Bug #3805 a lot, does anybody mind if I move this to the
New Feature Request component?
--
Adam W. Dace colonelforbi...@gmail.com
Phone: (815) 355-5848
Instant Messenger: AIM Yahoo! IM - colonelforbin74 | ICQ - #39374451
On 03/09/2013 12:24 AM, Amm wrote:
In short, for best results and to make sure that each worker uses separate
core
and dont end up using same core, one must use cpu_affinity_map as well?
Am I correct?
Based on our experience, yes. Similarly, keeping other significant
activities (e.g., NIC
On 03/09/2013 12:48 AM, jiluspo wrote:
Therefore squid SMP is not stable.
Support for ufs caching is not related to stability IMO, but perhaps
your definition of stable is different from mine.
if we need to store more than 32KB the
best way is to use multi-instance and peering...
Or use
Excusme David
What are the ab paramenters that use to test agains squid ?
thnks, Paul
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/squid-3-2-0-5-smp-scaling-issues-tp3395333p4658947.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 03/11/2013 03:05 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Alex Rousskov rouss...@measurement-factory.com:
On 03/08/2013 08:11 AM, Adam W. Dace wrote:
Does anyone have a simple example configuration for running Squid
3.3.2 with multiple workers?
You can just add workers 2 to squid.conf.default.
On 03/10/2013 03:13 PM, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote:
I am using squid 3.1.23 and not planning on migrating to a higher version for
another few months.
squid says 8 Duplicate URLs purged
It will not clear the actual stale files form disk
so cache.log says there are 8 less files than find command
On 03/09/2013 09:19 AM, Adam W. Dace wrote:
being able to use configuration like this sure makes it easier:
# Uncomment and adjust the following to add a disk cache directory.
cache_dir aufs /usr/local/squid/var/cache${process_number}/squid 1024 16 256
One should also add squid.conf
On 12/03/2013 8:11 a.m., paulm wrote:
Excusme David
What are the ab paramenters that use to test agains squid ?
-n for request count
-c for concurrency level
SMP in Squid shares a listening port so -c 1 will still test both
workers. But the results are more interesting as you vary client
On 12/03/2013 4:33 a.m., Magali Bernard wrote:
Hello,
After many years with squid as a proxy-cache combined with the proxy.pac or
WPAD client configurations, we are considering to use squid as a proxy with
interception (WCCP2) on our whole university site.
The reason essentially lies on
On 8/03/2013 11:33 p.m., Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Amos,
Du meintest am 08.03.13:
The Squid HTTP Proxy team is very pleased to announce the
availability of the Squid-3.3.2 release!
Compiling it on one of my machines stopped with
depbase=`echo peer_proxy_negotiate_auth.o | sed
Hello,
After many years with squid as a proxy-cache combined with the proxy.pac
or
WPAD client configurations, we are considering to use squid as a proxy with
interception (WCCP2) on our whole university site.
The reason essentially lies on complaints from users with their browsers
On 11/03/2013 11:07 p.m., benjamin fernandis wrote:
Hi,
Integrating squid box with rukus access point and captiive portal.
we have wifi users in network and we have captive portal for them.
For wifi, we are using ruckus access point and in there we configure
that to forward web traffic
How?
On 12/03/2013 11:50 a.m., Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 8/03/2013 11:33 p.m., Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Amos,
Du meintest am 08.03.13:
The Squid HTTP Proxy team is very pleased to announce the
availability of the Squid-3.3.2 release!
Compiling it on one of my machines stopped with
20 matches
Mail list logo
