[squid-users] ANN: squidpeek

2011-08-27 Thread Mark Nottingham
, it's most suitable for a reverse proxy. It's not the prettiest Python, but it gets the job done. Issues, pull requests, etc. welcome. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/

Re: [squid-users] How Squid behaves if we turn off Apache‏

2011-05-26 Thread Mark Nottingham
mirror of the site then pointing Squid to use that temporarily. Sending this static copy with a fixed Expires: set to the end of the upgrade outage will make all new requests transition to the new site version at a easily determined time. Amos -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: [squid-users] Re: Origin header fails on bridged-tproxy squid

2011-02-27 Thread Mark Nottingham
as Origin: in HTTP. Did you means Host: ? Squid uses the Host: header to determine destination IP unless configured otherwise. What are you seeing as the problem? Amos -- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.11 Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.5 -- Mark Nottingham

Re: [squid-users] Allow or deny HTCP CLR

2010-08-31 Thread Mark Nottingham
vriendelijke groet, Thijs Stuurman System Administrator Security Officer Nxs Internet BV Kabelweg 37, 1014 BA, Amsterdam T. +31 (0) 20 58 11 088 F. +31 (0) 20 58 11 071 E. beheer.li...@nxs.nl -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7 without signature

2010-05-05 Thread Mark Nottingham
campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments Why is it evil? -- http://www.georgedillon.com/web/html_email_is_evil.shtml -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1.1 and flash video scrubbing

2010-04-10 Thread Mark Nottingham
On 09/04/2010, at 9:05 PM, Henrik Nordström wrote: We don't know how the server would react on Range requests to this ranged fs=.. object. Maybe it imlpements them, maybe it don't. RED says it doesn't. -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1.1 and flash video scrubbing

2010-04-08 Thread Mark Nottingham
the requests hitting Squid are? headers, etc Amos -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: [squid-users] Version 2.5.STABLE14-20060721 support HTTP 1.1 ?

2010-03-10 Thread Mark Nottingham
ses éventuelles pièces jointes sont celles de l'émetteur. Elles ne reflètent pas la position de l'Organisme sauf s'il en est disposé autrement dans le présent courriel. ** -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: [squid-users] Squid not returning gzip files

2010-03-09 Thread Mark Nottingham
content. ( *, */*, gzip, deflate, identity ). If any of the responses come back without Vary: Accept-Encoding that needs to be fixed. Amos -- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE7 or 3.0.STABLE24 Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.17 -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: [squid-users] How can I edit err pages footer?

2010-03-03 Thread Mark Nottingham
Beta Squid 3.1.0.16 -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: [squid-users] Max throughput of CARP Proxy

2010-02-04 Thread Mark Nottingham
://www.acme.com/software/http_load/http_load-12mar2006.tar.gz Any ideas and hints are welcome. Cheers, Markus -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: [squid-users] Max throughput of CARP Proxy

2010-02-04 Thread Mark Nottingham
to be able to claim impressive numbers - hell, your numbers are impressive already.. Notice: if you implement multi-instance squid, an added boost might come from tying each instance to a specific CPU core (on Linux it's done via the taskset command) -- /kinkie -- Mark Nottingham

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7STABLE7 randomly crashes

2010-01-26 Thread Mark Nottingham
-- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: [squid-users] Help with extension_methods

2010-01-25 Thread Mark Nottingham
on the web. I am currently running squid3.0.STABLE21. Thanks, Dean Weimer Network Administrator Orscheln Management Co -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: [squid-users] Exception error:corrupted chunk size

2009-12-07 Thread Mark Nottingham
Jeffries wrote: Mark Nottingham wrote: It looks like they're sending Transfer-Encoding: chunked twice; http://redbot.org/?uri=http%3A%2F%2Ft.news-accorhotels.com%2Fnl%2Fjsp%2Fm.jsp%3Fc%3Da6f0cf19b1c0782ef7 Cheers, Maybe. But I'm inclined to believe its because ... (...drumroll please

Re: [squid-users] Exception error:corrupted chunk size

2009-12-07 Thread Mark Nottingham
, Amos Jeffries wrote: On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:38:33 +1100, Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: Seems to be, at a glance... HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: Caribou/5.0 Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 23:37:27 GMT Content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Transfer-Encoding: chunked Transfer-encoding

Re: [squid-users] Exception error:corrupted chunk size

2009-12-02 Thread Mark Nottingham
.x release to handle the chunking properly. If it still remains, the web server is badly broken. Complain to the website administrator. Amos -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: [squid-users] Custom max-age header

2009-10-26 Thread Mark Nottingham
to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. BSE = Mad Cow Desease ... BSA = Mad Software Producents Desease -- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE7 or 3.0.STABLE19 Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.14 -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: [squid-users] Architecture

2009-06-23 Thread Mark Nottingham
as the backend servers 3) A third server serving static resources I just didn't figure out your suggestion for storage. Thank you, Ronan -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: [squid-users] caching the uncacheable

2009-06-04 Thread Mark Nottingham
-revalidate Expires Wed, 17 Sep 1975 21:32:10 GMT Last-Modified Wed, 19 Apr 2000 11:43:00 GMT How to cache contents with this kind of headers? ignore-private ignore-no-cache ignore-must-revalidate ignore-reload override-expire override-lastmod what else do I need? ... store-stale? -- Mark

Re: [squid-users] squid 2.7 stable 6 increased load from 2.6

2009-04-27 Thread Mark Nottingham
to be deleted and re-stored with every 3xx message updating them. 2.6 only updated the memory copy, 2.7 alters the disk copy. Amos -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: [squid-users] HTCP logging?

2009-04-22 Thread Mark Nottingham
the ICP requests in the access log? Thanks, Dean Weimer Network Administrator Orscheln Management Co -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: [squid-users] Invalidating of a resource cached with a POST request

2009-04-22 Thread Mark Nottingham
request). (I used the 2.6 version of SQUID) thank you for your help Philippe -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: [squid-users] logging changes 2.6 - 2.7

2009-04-21 Thread Mark Nottingham
, TX 77005 GPG Key fingerprint = F023 82C8 9B0E 2CC6 0D8E F888 D3AE 810E 88F0 BEDE -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: [squid-users] An option to force keepalives for POST during forward proxy

2009-03-20 Thread Mark Nottingham
POSTs with keepalive. Can anyone point me in a general direction to get started on this? I am not familiar with the squid codebase. Also, does anyone know how much work it might be to implement this? Thanks, Mike -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: [squid-users] CARP question

2009-03-17 Thread Mark Nottingham
deterministic between multiple front-end squids? It is deterministic, and the idea is to cause the least disruption. Search on 'consistent hashing' for the math; it's the same technique used in Akamai, Hadoop/BigTable, etc. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: [squid-users] mallinfo() vs. sbrk()

2008-11-09 Thread Mark Nottingham
, Mark Nottingham wrote: thx. When mallinfo fails, how does it appear in cachemgr -- i.e., is there any way to reliably detect it just by examining the output? numbers wrap over and become negative, then 0 and positive again. Cycle repeats each 4 GB. (32-bit signed counters counting bytes

Re: [squid-users] mallinfo() vs. sbrk()

2008-11-07 Thread Mark Nottingham
thx. When mallinfo fails, how does it appear in cachemgr -- i.e., is there any way to reliably detect it just by examining the output? Cheers, On 06/11/2008, at 7:03 PM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: On tor, 2008-11-06 at 13:17 -0800, Mark Nottingham wrote: I remember reading somewhere (can't

[squid-users] mallinfo() vs. sbrk()

2008-11-06 Thread Mark Nottingham
() is considerably less than total size via mallinfo(). Is this unusual? Any thoughts about which is better, if both are available? Thanks, -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Expires: vs. Cache-Control: max-age

2008-10-02 Thread Mark Nottingham
? Thank you, Alex. Yes, that's it. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] negative_ttl vs. an Expires header -- which should win?

2008-10-02 Thread Mark Nottingham
cached a bit longer than 'negative_ttl', but they are not cached as long as the Expires header suggests, even with plentiful cache space. What is the designed intent of Squid -- should the 'negative_ttl' or the Expires header be definitive? - Gordon @ IA -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL

Re: [squid-users] How get negative cache along with origin server error?

2008-10-02 Thread Mark Nottingham
if that's intentional, a bug, or a missing feature. I also note that the HTTP 1.1 spec says that there MUST be a Warning 110 (Response is stale) header attached if stale data is returned and I'm not seeing those. - Dave -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Expires: vs. Cache-Control: max-age

2008-09-30 Thread Mark Nottingham
-Control: max-age header is present and the cached object should be fresh per that metric. What we're seeing is somewhat similar to bug 2430, but I want to make sure what we're seeing isn't expected behavior. Thanks, -Chris -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] external_refresh_check

2008-09-11 Thread Mark Nottingham
external_refresh_check in squid.conf and in perl script... -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Squid-2.7 vary failure w/ non-encoded objects?

2008-09-02 Thread Mark Nottingham
On 02/09/2008, at 7:39 PM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: tis 2008-09-02 klockan 11:28 +1000 skrev Mark Nottingham: Random thought: when an origin is doing one of these, is / can it be noted in cache.log somehow? Would be useful, at least for accelerator setups... Log when an URI goes from Vary

Re: [squid-users] Squid-2.7 vary failure w/ non-encoded objects?

2008-09-01 Thread Mark Nottingham
with this information. Adrian -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Persistent connect to cache_peer parent question

2008-07-15 Thread Mark Nottingham
by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them. -- Albert Einstein Russell Suter MX Logic, Inc. Phone: 720.895.4481 Your first line of email defense. http://www.mxlogic.com -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7 access log and url_rewrite_program

2008-07-15 Thread Mark Nottingham
some place to keep a lasing discussion about this. Not sure today what the solution will look like. http://bugs.squid-cache.org/ Regards Henrik -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] how safe is server_http11?

2008-07-06 Thread Mark Nottingham
HTTP/1.1 but doesn't have the spec completely implemented? Thanks, -C -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Combined log showing 0/0 for status/bytes?

2008-07-06 Thread Mark Nottingham
headers is known. Not sure what to make out of it on cache hits... but I guess it may be that the request was aborted before the RESPMOD response from the ICAP server is seen.. Regards Henrik -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] purge domain / more flexible purge ?

2008-06-29 Thread Mark Nottingham
(consider all pages contains a sidebar item of recent articles - need to be updated), Sure you can't loop all the pages and do the purge one by one... Then you need a way to purge by domain or subdomain, or even by folder... Roy -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Squid on steroids

2008-06-17 Thread Mark Nottingham
farm on steroids. Load balanced, multiple servers, etc. I've been googling around and found some documentation but does anyone have any direct experience with this? Any suggestions? Thank you in advance. -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Squid on steroids

2008-06-17 Thread Mark Nottingham
-- From: Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's your workload? E.g., is it going to be used as a proxy farm for dialup users? Broadband? If so, how many? Or, is it for an accelerator, and if so, how much content is there? Cheers, On 18/06/2008, at 5:07 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [squid-users] Squid log formats - 2.5-2.6?

2008-06-16 Thread Mark Nottingham
the logformat directive. The squid format is built-in, and may differ sligtly if you redefine it with a logformat directive.. Regards Henrik -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Re: squid-cache.org

2008-06-11 Thread Mark Nottingham
.STABLE6 -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] GET request with long URI TCP_DENIED

2008-05-19 Thread Mark Nottingham
-- Please use Squid 2.6.STABLE20 or 3.0.STABLE5 -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] retrieving 1 file with 50 concurrent connections from memory cache in reverse proxy is really slow?

2008-05-15 Thread Mark Nottingham
maximum_object_size_in_memory 1024 KB * I am using CentOS 5, squid v 2.6.STABLE6-5.el5_1. -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[squid-users] Melbourne Squid Users [was: Squid Users Groups?]

2008-04-24 Thread Mark Nottingham
I'm up for it... anybody else? On 18/04/2008, at 7:41 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: On Fri, Apr 18, 2008, Mark Nottingham wrote: Cache-Control: only-if-cached. Hmm... maybe we should start a Melbourne Squid Users Group... :) There's at least three of you. I'd be happy to start a Squid Users

Re: [squid-users] forcing retrieval of cached copy

2008-04-18 Thread Mark Nottingham
etc related headers and if there is a local cache copy at all, do not consult the web at all, not even for an if-modified-since query? -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] squid 2.7 behaviour

2008-03-17 Thread Mark Nottingham
mod_deflate. It can work, but I also get lots of the same warnings in cache.log. -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] squid 2.7 behaviour

2008-03-14 Thread Mark Nottingham
- Commercial Squid Support - - $25/pm entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in WA - -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Multi processors

2008-03-11 Thread Mark Nottingham
have looked up in this list old mails, and have not found anything. Thanks a lot, -- Marcos Camões Bourgeaiseau - KIKO e-mail pessoal: [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail institucional: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Re: Re: [squid-users] centra lized storage for squid

2008-03-10 Thread Mark Nottingham
://hk.promo.yahoo.com/security/index.html 了解更多。 Yahoo! 網上安全攻略,教你如何防範黑客! 請前往http://hk .promo.yahoo.com/security/index.html 了解更多。 -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Squid-2, Squid-3, roadmap

2008-03-10 Thread Mark Nottingham
contributing time or money to the cause, keeping in mind that it is a serious project and it will require cooperation with other developers and projects. On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 11:26 +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote: Again, parity with -2 isn't enough; why would someone pay for something they can already

Re: [squid-users] Squid-2, Squid-3, roadmap

2008-03-06 Thread Mark Nottingham
that jump out as independent enough to do this in the existing code base? -C On Mar 6, 2008, at 4:17 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: On Wed, Mar 05, 2008, Michael Puckett wrote: Mark Nottingham wrote: A killer app for -3 would be multi-core support (and the perf advantages that it would bring

Re: [squid-users] Squid-2, Squid-3, roadmap

2008-03-05 Thread Mark Nottingham
might find that some more transparency improves the process and vitality of the project. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Squid-2, Squid-3, roadmap

2008-03-05 Thread Mark Nottingham
, -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Squid-2, Squid-3, roadmap

2008-03-05 Thread Mark Nottingham
lighttpd have a huge performance advantage, and are getting to the point where it's pretty easy to write a module for them. Cheers, On 06/03/2008, at 12:52 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: A killer app for -3 would be multi-core support (and the perf advantages that it would bring

[squid-users] Squid-2, Squid-3, roadmap

2008-02-26 Thread Mark Nottingham
? * Who is not planning to use -3 soon? Why not? Thanks, -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Squid meetup in london

2008-02-26 Thread Mark Nottingham
for food and (optionally) alcohol on Saturday evening - I'll post details here mid-friday. -Rob -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Asking for feedback on new Squid Wiki theme

2008-02-05 Thread Mark Nottingham
, and please report your opinions. Thanks! -- /kinkie -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Asking for feedback on new Squid Wiki theme

2008-02-05 Thread Mark Nottingham
The problem is that it depends on the gamma of the monitor, which is different user-to-user, and OS-to-OS, monitor-to-monitor, etc. On 05/02/2008, at 5:08 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: On Tue, Feb 05, 2008, Mark Nottingham wrote: Great job! Looks very nice -- except that the background image

Re: [squid-users] Issue with getting python ICAP server running

2008-01-30 Thread Mark Nottingham
-packages/regex.py, line 16, in module from Token import Token ImportError: cannot import name Token I would appreciate any help from you guys or just point me towards some sort of howto. -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] client_http.hit_median_svc_time: what's the definition, again ?

2008-01-28 Thread Mark Nottingham
? Yes. http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/200606/0351.html If it does, then these 'hit' times make sense. if it doesn't, well then I'm confuzzed. :) thanks guys, John Allspaw Chris -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Reverse Proxy Cache - implementing gzip

2008-01-20 Thread Mark Nottingham
it wanted. But believe that is the RFC compliance that squid seems to be hard pressed to conform with. How much would it cost to get Squid to preserve the http version so that our servers could provide gzip functionality? Tory -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Re: Squid http1.1 vs http1.0 (probably again)

2008-01-15 Thread Mark Nottingham
...and work that's commissioned by other folks who need new features in a production-ready Squid. Cheers, On 15/01/2008, at 11:28 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: Features are largely the reverse. Ported down. With the exception of Adrians work. -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[squid-users] FYI: cache channels, etc.

2008-01-06 Thread Mark Nottingham
Just a quick FYI - we contracted Henrik to do a few things. They may be of wider interest, so they've found their way into 2.7. For more information, see: http://www.mnot.net/blog/2007/12/12/stale http://www.mnot.net/blog/2008/01/04/cache_channels Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham

Re: [squid-users] Squid-2.7 branched (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]: cvs commit: squid configure.in])

2008-01-01 Thread Mark Nottingham
-20071224. Script done on Mon Dec 24 14:55:16 2007 -- - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support - - $25/pm entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in WA - -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Pending Squid-2.7 release - testers wanted!

2007-12-19 Thread Mark Nottingham
-- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Future of ESI

2007-12-06 Thread Mark Nottingham
page). I'm evaluating whether ESI might be the silver bullet. j -- - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support - - $25/pm entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in WA - -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] read_ahead_gap

2007-11-15 Thread Mark Nottingham
, Mark Nottingham wrote: I'd like to double-check the semantics of read_ahead_gap. AIUI, Squid will buffer up to that much data on both requests and responses, in addition to the TCP send and receive buffers. responses only. So, if I have (for the sake of argument) 16K TCP read buffers, 24K

[squid-users] read_ahead_gap

2007-11-13 Thread Mark Nottingham
, -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] criticism against squid

2007-08-30 Thread Mark Nottingham
into the doomsday scenarios they paint... Now.. if your from flickr.. and you use Squid.. Seems like a big company like yours should be making some nice donations.. poke poke.. That would help squid get updated :) Stay tuned. -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Opinions sought on best storage type for FreeBSD

2007-08-13 Thread Mark Nottingham
the amount of I/O threads. The default selected by Squid based on your squid.conf is quite reasonable. Regards Henrik -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] ESI feature in squid3?

2007-05-30 Thread Mark Nottingham
project is entirely community driven, and features not having noticeable support from the users evolve very slowly.. Regards Henrik -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] new website: final beta

2007-05-10 Thread Mark Nottingham
to the server - there's no point in having to do the whole database query set and parse the database replies just to generate etags, for example!) so I figure this can double as that. Now, where's that spare time.. Adrian -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] comm_select: kevent failure: (9) Bad file descriptor

2007-03-26 Thread Mark Nottingham
(~6k proxied req/sec (6k client sockets, 6k server sockets) with ~3000 to ~4000 concurrent connections. Its sane.) If someone wants to beat me to fixing then please, by all means. :) Adrian -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.6.STABLE9 and caching of 302 redirects

2007-02-13 Thread Mark Nottingham
-- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.6.STABLE9 and caching of 302 redirects

2007-02-05 Thread Mark Nottingham
with Squid running on x86 PC servers running the 32-bit version of SLES9 Linux - but that seems rather unlikely to be relevant to the problem.] John Line -- John Line - web news development, University of Cambridge Computing Service -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL

[squid-users] Thoughts on an invalidation protocol

2006-11-29 Thread Mark Nottingham
in the invalidation channel, and so on. Thoughts? -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[squid-users] refresh_stale_hit, collapsed_forwarding and Cache-Control: no-cache request headers

2006-11-17 Thread Mark Nottingham
desirable, but it's not a huge deal; just thought I should mention it in case somebody got near this code again. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] 2 tilde in URL = bogus or not ?

2006-10-26 Thread Mark Nottingham
? M. -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] POST cacheability

2006-10-23 Thread Mark Nottingham
What does it do with variants currently? I.e., if it gets a CLR for one variant, will it also purge other ones on the same URI? On 2006/10/20, at 1:11 PM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: fre 2006-10-20 klockan 10:32 -0700 skrev Mark Nottingham: The tricky part of doing that, I think

Re: [squid-users] POST cacheability

2006-10-20 Thread Mark Nottingham
-0700 skrev Mark Nottingham: Overall, caching POST responses would be nice. If I were prioritising, however, I'd be much more excited about getting Squid conformant to section 13.10 (invalidations from side effects). Fully argreed. Regards Henrik -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] POST cacheability

2006-10-19 Thread Mark Nottingham
side effects). Cheers, On 2006/10/17, at 2:24 PM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: mån 2006-10-16 klockan 22:17 -0700 skrev Mark Nottingham: That's been my understanding of it for many years, and I've heard others say likewise. Been reading the RFC up and down, and can't in my way of reading it find

Re: [squid-users] HTTP protocol violation error using .NET 2.0 web services through Squid-2.5 proxy

2006-10-19 Thread Mark Nottingham
www.qsrinternational.com -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] POST cacheability

2006-10-14 Thread Mark Nottingham
the response includes a Cache-Control or Expires header. I'm using Cache-Control max-age in the responses, but Squid still doesn't cache the POST responses. Did I miss something in the Squid configuration? Thank in advance, Zsolt -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] elapsed time accuracy

2006-09-29 Thread Mark Nottingham
Hmm... looking at this a bit more closely, I'm also seeing this on responses that are uncachable (and therefore shouldn't be collapsed). On 2006/09/28, at 8:20 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: You mean with collapsed forwarding? That makes perfect sense, if collapsed requests are logged

[squid-users] elapsed time accuracy

2006-09-27 Thread Mark Nottingham
thought was aborted requests, but it appears that about the right number of bytes were written. Thanks, -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Persistent Connections

2006-09-20 Thread Mark Nottingham
an HTTP/1.0 header making it likely proxies does not understand Connection: keep- alive.. A client accepting Connection: keep-alive as keep-alive of a proxied connection is broken not respecting the Netscape specifications for keep-alive for HTTP/1.0. Regards Henrik -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL

Re: [squid-users] Persistent Connections

2006-09-20 Thread Mark Nottingham
responses. Yes, I realise that's pretty sick. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Persistent Connections

2006-09-20 Thread Mark Nottingham
with both signaled by close of connection. -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[squid-users] refresh_stale_hit - refresh_stale_window?

2006-09-11 Thread Mark Nottingham
. Is this a known problem, and should it work to just use refresh_stale_window in P3? Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] refresh_stale_hit - refresh_stale_window?

2006-09-11 Thread Mark Nottingham
Nevermind, I just looked at cf.data.pre... On 2006/09/11, at 3:03 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: Looking through the source of P3, I *think* what's documented as refresh_stale_hit is actually coded as refresh_stale_window -- the only place the former occurs is in comments, the config file

[squid-users] httpd_accel_with_proxy (again)

2006-09-09 Thread Mark Nottingham
combinations of likely http_port and cache_peer lines, sometimes with a sprinkling of always_direct, but with no luck. (yes, I know this isn't a recommended configuration...) Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] Large Files

2006-09-07 Thread Mark Nottingham
outside one thread/process per request designs is not trivial. So it works quite nicely for most traditional servers, but not that well for event loop based ones.. -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] delivering stale content while fetching fresh

2006-09-07 Thread Mark Nottingham
other requests with the same base, e.g., http://example.com/search?q=bar Even better, a response cache-control extension could control this... Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [squid-users] delivering stale content while fetching fresh

2006-09-07 Thread Mark Nottingham
, -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[squid-users] Large Files

2006-09-01 Thread Mark Nottingham
cache, does it get copied when it is requested (because it is in-transit)? - How does sendfile support in 2.6 affect this? - Does anyone have any experiences they'd care to relate regarding memory-caching very large objects? Thanks! -- Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]