Re: [squid-users] problem with follow_xff patch

a patched squid version > > 2.5.STABLE10 suitable for debian sarge. > > You probably should upgrade to 2.5.STABLE11 + delay_pools patch. See > http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/bugs/ for details. > > Regards > Henrik > Met vriendelijke groet/Regards, Ruud Baart Prompt, Kerkstraat 173 5261 CW Vught, Netherlands Tel: +31 73 6567041 http://www.prompt.nl

Re: [squid-users] problem with follow_xff patch

w X-Forwarded-For enabled" follow_xff=1 fi ]) if test $follow_xff = 1; then AC_DEFINE(FOLLOW_X_FORWARDED_FOR, 1, [Enable following X-Forwarded-For headers]) else AC_DEFINE(FOLLOW_X_FORWARDED_FOR, 0) fi > * On 29/09/05 13:00 +0200, Ruud Baart wrote: > > I've made a new 2.5.STA

[squid-users] problem with follow_xff patch

nized: 'follow_x_forwarded_for allow localhost' What went wrong? Any ideas? Met vriendelijke groet/Regards, Ruud Baart Prompt, Kerkstraat 173 5261 CW Vught, Netherlands Tel: +31 73 6567041 http://www.prompt.nl

[squid-users] LDAP auhentication + transparent proxy

I've read somewhere in the archives that (LDAP) authentication won't work in combination with transparent proxy. I could not found the reason for this. Does someone know the reason? Met vriendelijke groet/Regards, Ruud Baart Prompt, Kerkstraat 173 5261 CW Vught, Netherlands T