Le Wed, 12 May 2010 21:58:38 +0200,
Henrik Nordström hen...@henriknordstrom.net a écrit :
ons 2010-05-12 klockan 17:20 +0200 skrev Emmanuel Lesouef:
Le Wed, 12 May 2010 23:10:00 +0800,
Jeff Pang pa...@arcor.de a écrit :
How about upgrading squid to the latest version (2.7 or 3.1)?
Hi Hassan,
Le Thu, 13 May 2010 04:03:01 +0600,
Nyamul Hassan mnhas...@usa.net a écrit :
Every iteration of stable release has some fixes for known problems,
and might also inadvertently introduce a new problem, which has to be
fixed after a bug report is done.
That is why it is suggested
Hello,
I'm facing a strange issue with our Squid proxy.
The situation is that one of our users reports us that when he tries
to get a small file (under 2kb it seems), his browser leave him with a
zero size text file.
If we test with a direct access to the internet, the file is well sized
(453
2010/5/12 Emmanuel Lesouef e.leso...@crbn.fr:
Hello,
I'm facing a strange issue with our Squid proxy.
The situation is that one of our users reports us that when he tries
to get a small file (under 2kb it seems), his browser leave him with a
zero size text file.
It sounds squid has cached
Le Wed, 12 May 2010 22:52:02 +0800,
Jeff Pang pa...@arcor.de a écrit :
2010/5/12 Emmanuel Lesouef e.leso...@crbn.fr:
Hello,
I'm facing a strange issue with our Squid proxy.
The situation is that one of our users reports us that when he tries
to get a small file (under 2kb it seems),
Le Wed, 12 May 2010 23:10:00 +0800,
Jeff Pang pa...@arcor.de a écrit :
How about upgrading squid to the latest version (2.7 or 3.1)?
Ouch... This is Debian Stable. And the server is part of a critical
cluster...
To summarize, it is not possible to upgrade to v3.1...
--
Emmanuel Lesouef
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Lesouef [mailto:e.leso...@crbn.fr]
Sent: Wednesday, 12 May, 2010 07:20
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] File with zero size when using squid proxy
Le Wed, 12 May 2010 23:10:00 +0800,
Jeff Pang pa...@arcor.de a écrit
ons 2010-05-12 klockan 17:20 +0200 skrev Emmanuel Lesouef:
Le Wed, 12 May 2010 23:10:00 +0800,
Jeff Pang pa...@arcor.de a écrit :
How about upgrading squid to the latest version (2.7 or 3.1)?
Ouch... This is Debian Stable. And the server is part of a critical
cluster...
To
Le Wed, 12 May 2010 08:38:31 -0800,
James Zuelow james_zue...@ci.juneau.ak.us a écrit :
Backports has 2.7STABLE7 which is newer than the Lenny version, if
not quite up to date. 2.7STABLE9 has been in Squeeze for a couple of
weeks (since April 28) so might be in the backports pipe now.
That
Every iteration of stable release has some fixes for known problems,
and might also inadvertently introduce a new problem, which has to be
fixed after a bug report is done.
That is why it is suggested to use the latest version, so that the
developers can work on the latest code. As you can
10 matches
Mail list logo
