On 25 May 2011 19:17, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
On 25/05/11 14:10, Rhys Evans wrote:
Seeing as I don't have any neighbour caches, I set htcp_port 0 and
things seem to be OK. It still seems odd that this issue came up, I'm
wondering if maybe some Windows update altered some
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:09:27 +1200, Rhys Evans wrote:
On 25 May 2011 19:17, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
On 25/05/11 14:10, Rhys Evans wrote:
Seeing as I don't have any neighbour caches, I set htcp_port 0 and
things seem to be OK. It still seems odd that this issue came up,
I'm
On 25/05/11 14:10, Rhys Evans wrote:
Seeing as I don't have any neighbour caches, I set htcp_port 0 and
things seem to be OK. It still seems odd that this issue came up, I'm
wondering if maybe some Windows update altered some behaviour in
regard to allowing the binding required?
Looks similar
I've tried an absolutely fresh install of squid and still get a 1067
error when starting the service. There is now nothing written to
squid.exe.log but cache.log includes the text below:
2011/05/25 13:54:39| Starting Squid Cache version 2.7.STABLE8 for
i686-pc-winnt...
2011/05/25 13:54:39|
Seeing as I don't have any neighbour caches, I set htcp_port 0 and
things seem to be OK. It still seems odd that this issue came up, I'm
wondering if maybe some Windows update altered some behaviour in
regard to allowing the binding required?
On 25 May 2011 13:58, Rhys Evans rhys.ev...@gmail.com
