[squid-users] Re: performances ... again

2008-06-07 Thread Linda W
GARDAIS Ionel wrote: Beside the fact that the hit rate is low, response time are way too long for users (cache-misses median service times are around 200ms and cache-hits are around 3ms) Have you tried access without a squid-proxy -- but maybe using 'socks' (if you need to bridge

RE: [squid-users] RE: performances ... again

2008-06-06 Thread Dean Weimer
before going through the proxy on every page. Thanks, Dean Weimer Network Administrator Orscheln Management Co -Original Message- From: Ionel GARDAIS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 12:55 AM To: squid-users@squid-cache.org Subject: Re: [squid-users] RE

[squid-users] RE: performances ... again

2008-06-05 Thread Ritter, Nicholas
I had a problem similar to this at another job site a coulple of years ago. The clients were windows xp machines, and they were using wpad/pac style configuration. The fix was transparent caching. -Nick -Original Message- From: Dean Weimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday,

Re: [squid-users] RE: performances ... again

2008-06-05 Thread Ionel GARDAIS
We are using a pac script, mostly with Windows XP clients ... @Dean : the second page does not load faster than the first one. Browser repsonse time are much better early in the morning (with less connection obviously). When a blank page takes too much time to load, doing a refresh or