On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Lizzy Dizzy wrote:
Hi Henrik, no, we are'nt using download manager, but how exactly Microsoft
BIT (Background Intelligent Transfer) optimize the downloading is not clear.
It probably acts in the same stupid manner.
Regards
Henrik
At 07:54 AM 7/18/2004, Merton Campbell Crockett wrote:
I have several Squid proxy caches running in a production environment but
haven't encountered any problems with the cacheable content from Windows
Update messing up the cache. Other than the basic Windows Update page
there is little
and so should be cached.
What size is your maximum cachable object? Ours is about 300MB The
high limit allows us to have all sorts of odds and ends in our cache.
From: Guy Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lizzy Dizzy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [squid-users
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Lizzy Dizzy wrote:
Does this helps?
TCP_MISS/206 2417 GET
http://download.windowsupdate.com/msdownload/update/v3-19990518/cabpool/IE6.0sp1-KB823353-x86-ENU_5ee60d6c9b9464c7ddf332147ebd16f.exe
- DIRECT/210.184.108.125 application/x-msdownload
TCP_MISS/206 2441 GET
: Microsoft-IIS/6.0..Content-Range: bytes
1267311-1288457/1996544..Content-
Length: 21147..Connection: keep-alive
Rgds
Liz
From: Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lizzy Dizzy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [squid-users
.exe
objects.
Rgds
Liz
From: Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lizzy Dizzy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [squid-users] download.windowsupdate.com
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:37:51 +0200 (CEST)
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Lizzy Dizzy wrote
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004, Brett Glass wrote:
At 09:20 AM 7/17/2004, Merton Campbell Crockett wrote:
Microsoft has changed how updates are performed and now uses an SSL
connection for the actual download.
While it WOULD be like Microsoft to do that (thereby ensuring that it
can track every
also like to learn with you.
Regards
Babar Kazmi.
From: Brett Glass [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lizzy Dizzy [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [squid-users]
download.windowsupdate.com
Squid does NOT handle Windows Update properly. In
fact, it multiplies
the traffic
also like to learn with you.
Regards
Babar Kazmi.
From: Brett Glass [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lizzy Dizzy [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [squid-users]
download.windowsupdate.com
Squid does NOT handle Windows Update properly. In
fact, it multiplies
the traffic
also like to learn with you.
Regards
Babar Kazmi.
From: Brett Glass [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lizzy Dizzy [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [squid-users]
download.windowsupdate.com
Squid does NOT handle Windows Update properly. In
fact, it multiplies
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 03:13, Brett Glass wrote:
Squid does NOT handle Windows Update properly. In fact, it multiplies
the traffic by a factor of 1000 in some cases! This is a serious bug
in Squid that really should be fixed.
On 16.07 07:13, Robert Collins wrote:
Got some details?
It's
At 09:20 AM 7/17/2004, Merton Campbell Crockett wrote:
Microsoft has changed how updates are performed and now uses an SSL
connection for the actual download.
While it WOULD be like Microsoft to do that (thereby ensuring that it
can track every individual user of its products), it is not what
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [squid-users] download.windowsupdate.com
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 11:58:22 +0100
Lizzy Dizzy wrote:
Hi,
anyone has their squid cache slowed down by this website? Especially these
few days? I notice a surge in the number of request to this site.
No. It's one of the most
-users] download.windowsupdate.com
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:13:23 +1000
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 03:13, Brett Glass wrote:
Squid does NOT handle Windows Update properly. In fact, it multiplies
the traffic by a factor of 1000 in some cases! This is a serious bug
in Squid that really should be fixed
On Sat, 2004-07-17 at 06:34, Brett Glass wrote:
Yes, this helps. As you can see, the Windows client attempts to
fetch a subrange. This causes the Squid proxy to query its parent,
which in turn does a TCP_REFRESH_HIT and downloads the ENTIRE FILE
(which is often several megabytes) to the child
: [squid-users] download.windowsupdate.com
Squid does NOT handle Windows Update properly. In fact, it multiplies
the traffic by a factor of 1000 in some cases! This is a serious bug
in Squid that really should be fixed.
--Brett Glass
At 03:33 AM 7/15/2004, Lizzy Dizzy wrote:
Hi,
anyone has
Hi,
anyone has their squid cache slowed down by this website? Especially these
few days? I notice a surge in the number of request to this site. I have set
my FileDescriptors to 8192, yet everytime it slows down the squid when only
4000 are used. Even cache HITS are affected.
Rgds
Lizz
Lizzy Dizzy wrote:
Hi,
anyone has their squid cache slowed down by this website? Especially
these few days? I notice a surge in the number of request to this site.
No. It's one of the most important websites for us to cache!
Microsoft release patches once a month (normally) on the second
Squid does NOT handle Windows Update properly. In fact, it multiplies
the traffic by a factor of 1000 in some cases! This is a serious bug
in Squid that really should be fixed.
--Brett Glass
At 03:33 AM 7/15/2004, Lizzy Dizzy wrote:
Hi,
anyone has their squid cache slowed down by this
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 03:13, Brett Glass wrote:
Squid does NOT handle Windows Update properly. In fact, it multiplies
the traffic by a factor of 1000 in some cases! This is a serious bug
in Squid that really should be fixed.
Got some details?
Rob
--
GPG key available at:
4.234.46..Cache-Control: no-cache, max-age=259200..Connection:
keep-alive
From: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brett Glass [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Lizzy Dizzy [EMAIL PROTECTED],Squid Users
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [squid-users] download.windowsupdate.com
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:13:23
21 matches
Mail list logo
