How about Digest authentication?
Does digest is as weak as NTLM?
and another question:
Is it possible to use Kerberos (actually Negotiate) protocol for squid
user authentication in a network without any Active Directory or
Domain?
On 9/14/10, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
On Mon,
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Isaac NickAein nickaei...@gmail.com wrote:
How about Digest authentication?
Does digest is as weak as NTLM?
and another question:
Is it possible to use Kerberos (actually Negotiate) protocol for squid
user authentication in a network without any Active
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 08:25:02 -0500, Terry td3...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Isaac NickAein nickaei...@gmail.com
wrote:
How about Digest authentication?
Does digest is as weak as NTLM?
Digest has security-level extensions that can be dialed from session
equivalent to a
I have a working NTLM implementation in place and it works great from
yum and wget for example. However, when I try to use squid from IE8,
it prompts for password and I never see the credentials hit squid,
just this for example:
1284395121.846 0 10.8.1.100 TCP_DENIED/407 1798 GET
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:28:13 -0500, Terry td3...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a working NTLM implementation in place and it works great from
yum and wget for example. However, when I try to use squid from IE8,
it prompts for password and I never see the credentials hit squid,
just this for
