>> These are some performance stats from network admin who have been willing to
>> donate the info publicly:
>> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/KnowledgeBase/Benchmarks
>
> How do we post results on the above wiki page?
Instructions on how to apply are on the main wiki page.
Quoting:
To contribute t
On 13/03/2012 3:21 p.m., Michael Hendrie wrote:
On 11/03/2012, at 10:21 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 9/03/2012 4:52 a.m., Student University wrote:
Hi ,
This is Liley ,,,
can anyone tell me what
requests per second can squid3 serves ,
especially if we run it on the top of a hardware with OCZ R
On 13.03.2012 02:37, guest01 wrote:
Hi,
We are using Squid as forward-proxy for about 10-20k clients with
about 1200RPS.
In our setup, we are using 4 physical servers (HP ProLiant DL380
G6/G7
with 16CPU, 32GB RAM) with RHEL5.8 64Bit as OS with a dedicated
hardware loadbalancer. At the moment,
On 13.03.2012 00:44, Student University wrote:
Hi David
You achieve 2K with what version of squid ,,,
do you have any special configuration tweaks ,,,
also what if i use SSD [200,000 Random Write 4K IOPS]
Best Regards ,,,
Liley
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:59 AM, David B.wrote:
Hi Jenny,
On 11/03/2012, at 10:21 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 9/03/2012 4:52 a.m., Student University wrote:
>> Hi ,
>> This is Liley ,,,
>>
>> can anyone tell me what
>> requests per second can squid3 serves ,
>> especially if we run it on the top of a hardware with OCZ RevoDrive 3
>> X2 (200,000 Rando
On 13/03/2012, at 12:07 AM, guest01 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are using Squid as forward-proxy for about 10-20k clients with
> about 1200RPS.
>
> IMHO, it is really important which features you are planning to use.
> For example, we are using authentication (kerberos, ntlm, ldap) and
> ICAP content
Hi,
We are using Squid as forward-proxy for about 10-20k clients with
about 1200RPS.
In our setup, we are using 4 physical servers (HP ProLiant DL380 G6/G7
with 16CPU, 32GB RAM) with RHEL5.8 64Bit as OS with a dedicated
hardware loadbalancer. At the moment, the average server load is
approx 0.6.
Hi,
It's only a reverse proxy cache, not a proxy. This is different.
We use squid only for images.
Squid : 3.1.x
OS : debian 64 bits
Le 12/03/2012 12:44, Student University a écrit :
> Hi David
>
> You achieve 2K with what version of squid ,,,
> do you have any special configuration tweaks
Hi David
You achieve 2K with what version of squid ,,,
do you have any special configuration tweaks ,,,
also what if i use SSD [200,000 Random Write 4K IOPS]
Best Regards ,,,
Liley
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:59 AM, David B. wrote:
> Hi Jenny,
>
> Reverse proxy or not ?
> We're using squid
Hi Jenny,
Reverse proxy or not ?
We're using squid as reverse proxy et only that.
We can achieve about 2K RPS with our boxes and this server isn't
overloaded...
In fact, it's common hardware, like mono dual core Xéon, some RAM and a
poor RAID 1 disk array without BBU.
I think 5K RPS is possible.
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 12.03.2012 01:13, Student University wrote:
Dears ,
how we can achieve 5000 RPS through squid
Thanks in advance
Liley
Why are you asking?
Or another question, what is the RPS that you are getting now? Then we can
look and see where the b
On 12.03.2012 01:13, Student University wrote:
Dears ,
how we can achieve 5000 RPS through squid
Thanks in advance
Liley
Why are you asking?
Amos
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 9/03/2012 4:52 a.m., Student University wrote:
Hi ,
This is Liley ,,,
can a
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Jenny Lee wrote:
>
>> Dears ,
>>
>> how we can achieve 5000 RPS through squid
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>> Liley
>
>
> In your dreams.
Now now.. :-)
It _is_ doable, just very complex, more expensive and less reliable
than using a cluster of servers with a load-
> Dears ,
>
> how we can achieve 5000 RPS through squid
>
> Thanks in advance
> Liley
In your dreams.
Jenny
Dears ,
how we can achieve 5000 RPS through squid
Thanks in advance
Liley
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 9/03/2012 4:52 a.m., Student University wrote:
>>
>> Hi ,
>> This is Liley ,,,
>>
>> can anyone tell me what
>> requests per second can squid3 serves ,
>> e
On 9/03/2012 4:52 a.m., Student University wrote:
Hi ,
This is Liley ,,,
can anyone tell me what
requests per second can squid3 serves ,
especially if we run it on the top of a hardware with OCZ RevoDrive 3
X2 (200,000 Random Write 4K IOPS)
Thanks in advance .
These are some performance stats
Hi ,
This is Liley ,,,
can anyone tell me what
requests per second can squid3 serves ,
especially if we run it on the top of a hardware with OCZ RevoDrive 3
X2 (200,000 Random Write 4K IOPS)
Thanks in advance .
BarneyC wrote:
The 800 RPS is on a 100Mb/s network? The 5000 RPS? That was my question. I'm
not really concerned with what "other" people get on their systems, as every
system will be different. I want to know how many RPS I can expect to
encounter on a busy 100Mb/s residential network.
I ha
The 800 RPS is on a 100Mb/s network? The 5000 RPS? That was my question. I'm
not really concerned with what "other" people get on their systems, as every
system will be different. I want to know how many RPS I can expect to
encounter on a busy 100Mb/s residential network.
--
View this message in
BarneyC wrote:
I'm trying to get a handle on the number of RPS (Maximum) a residential ISP
is likely to see on a busy 100Mb/s network (close to capacity). Most of the
stats I see on here seem pretty low.
I'm trying to at least interpolate the largest network load a single squid
box could handl
Several hundred requests per second, measured by a telco provider
squid gateway system in production usage.
I have measured 400+ in the lab for 2.7 and 600+ in the lab for
3.0STABLE3 and beyond (but latest is best); I haven't benchmarked 3.1.
I have seen sustained stable performance of prod serve
I'm trying to get a handle on the number of RPS (Maximum) a residential ISP
is likely to see on a busy 100Mb/s network (close to capacity). Most of the
stats I see on here seem pretty low.
I'm trying to at least interpolate the largest network load a single squid
box could handle without requiri
22 matches
Mail list logo
