...
Amos
I made some cut from our previous posts to avoid any confusion.
Sorry I haven't had much to do with winbind than we have already
tried.
you are the first I've seen where these fixes have not worked.
Can you get a full ls -la trace of the directory content and
permissions
at
...
Amos
I made some cut from our previous posts to avoid any confusion.
Sorry I haven't had much to do with winbind than we have already
tried.
you are the first I've seen where these fixes have not worked.
Can you get a full ls -la trace of the directory content and
permissions
at
...
Amos
I made some cut from our previous posts to avoid any confusion.
Sorry I haven't had much to do with winbind than we have already tried.
you are the first I've seen where these fixes have not worked.
Can you get a full ls -la trace of the directory content and
permissions
at a time
...
Amos
I made some cut from our previous posts to avoid any confusion.
Sorry I haven't had much to do with winbind than we have already
tried.
you are the first I've seen where these fixes have not worked.
Can you get a full ls -la trace of the directory content and
permissions
at a
vincent.blon...@ing.be wrote:
...
Amos
I made some cut from our previous posts to avoid any confusion.
Sorry I haven't had much to do with winbind than we have already tried.
you are the first I've seen where these fixes have not worked.
Can you get a full ls -la trace of the directory
...
Amos
I made some cut from our previous posts to avoid any confusion.
Sorry I haven't had much to do with winbind than we have already
tried.
you are the first I've seen where these fixes have not worked.
Can you get a full ls -la trace of the directory content and
permissions
at a
...
I made some cut from our previous posts to avoid any confusion.
Sorry I haven't had much to do with winbind than we have already tried.
you are the first I've seen where these fixes have not worked.
Can you get a full ls -la trace of the directory content and
permissions
at a time where
Hello all,
I really get a strange ( maybe not ?? ) problem. I get Squid 2.7.4
running on Solaris 8 with Samba 3.0.32. My clients are essentially
running Windows XP SP2 with IE6.
authentication scheme is exclusively based on ntlm so this is the
reason
why winbindd is also running, smbd and
Hello all,
I really get a strange ( maybe not ?? ) problem. I get Squid 2.7.4
running on Solaris 8 with Samba 3.0.32. My clients are essentially
running Windows XP SP2 with IE6.
authentication scheme is exclusively based on ntlm so this is the
reason
why winbindd is also running, smbd and
Hello all,
I really get a strange ( maybe not ?? ) problem. I get Squid 2.7.4
running on Solaris 8 with Samba 3.0.32. My clients are essentially
running Windows XP SP2 with IE6.
authentication scheme is exclusively based on ntlm so this is the
reason
why winbindd is also running, smbd
Hello all,
I really get a strange ( maybe not ?? ) problem. I get Squid 2.7.4
running on Solaris 8 with Samba 3.0.32. My clients are essentially
running Windows XP SP2 with IE6.
authentication scheme is exclusively based on ntlm so this is the reason
why winbindd is also running, smbd and nmbd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I really get a strange ( maybe not ?? ) problem. I get Squid 2.7.4
running on Solaris 8 with Samba 3.0.32. My clients are essentially
running Windows XP SP2 with IE6.
authentication scheme is exclusively based on ntlm so this is the reason
why winbindd is
Hello all,
I really get a strange ( maybe not ?? ) problem. I get Squid 2.7.4
running on Solaris 8 with Samba 3.0.32. My clients are essentially
running Windows XP SP2 with IE6.
authentication scheme is exclusively based on ntlm so this is the
reason
why winbindd is also running, smbd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I really get a strange ( maybe not ?? ) problem. I get Squid 2.7.4
running on Solaris 8 with Samba 3.0.32. My clients are essentially
running Windows XP SP2 with IE6.
authentication scheme is exclusively based on ntlm so this is the
reason
why winbindd is
14 matches
Mail list logo
