Hi all,
I've read that aufs and diskd are much much better than ufs.
I am trying to
decide between the two.
I've read that aufs is the better one (in terms of performance), but
probabability of crashing is higher?
I haven't seen problems with my aufs based configuration in
-users] diskd VS aufs
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:00:43 +0200
Hi all,
I've read that aufs and diskd are much much better than ufs.
I am trying to
decide between the two.
I've read that aufs is the better one (in terms of performance), but
probabability of crashing is higher?
I haven't seen
Thanks. I suppose I do not need to rebuild the cache (./squid
-z). But what
No, you don't.
makes you conclude that FreeBSD diskd is the better choice.
Under Solaris
and Linux use aufs.?
I seem to remember this was a FAQ, I may be wrong, at least I can't
find it for the
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Elsen Marc wrote:
Thanks. I suppose I do not need to rebuild the cache (./squid
-z). But what
No, you don't.
makes you conclude that FreeBSD diskd is the better choice.
Under Solaris
and Linux use aufs.?
I seem to remember this was a FAQ, I may be wrong, at least I can't
