On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 07:52, Jim Flowers wrote:
> This should work great when the URL used to reach the accel server is the same as
> that of the name-based virtual host on the originserver but I am using a different
> name
> for testing purposes.
Ok, you need:
forceddomain=name
in your cache
OK, I think I'm just about done with this. I can handle requests for fixed-
ip and virtual ip-based hosts on different networks and servers but not name-
based virtual hosts using:
http_port ip:80 vhost defaultsite=www.mymaindomain.com
cache_peer origin-host-ip parent 80 0 no-query originserve
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 04.49, Tay Teck Wee wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> So what would be a good guide? 8 per drive? how many
> drives did the default 16 base on?
The Squid-2.5 code uses 16 per drive.
Regards
Henrik
--
Donations welcome if you consider my Free Squid support helpful.
https://www.pay
Hi all,
There is this known problem with internet explorer and basic authentication
(FAQ 5.13). Now when the patch for this became available we informed our
users and everybody was happy again. Until...
we changed user authentication to authenticate agains an OpenLDAP server and
the problem is bac
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 07:09, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 August 2003 22.12, Nick Bartos wrote:
> > I have been searching for a way to get an include directive in the
> > squid.conf file. I found a patch, but it didn't apply to the
> > latest stable version. I also see that someone add
Hi,
Hi,
every time when squid starts storeDirWriteCleanLogs it can't write into the
access.log file anymore.
2003/08/07 12:03:40| storeDirWriteCleanLogs: Starting...
2003/08/07 12:03:40| WARNING: Closing open FD 19
2003/08/07 12:03:42| 65536 entries written so far.
2003/08/07 12:03:45|
On Thursday 07 August 2003 01.26, Brian Hechinger wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:11:32PM +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> > Yes, but what you may need to never_direct also..
>
> ok, if i read the documentation correctly, always_direct is matched
> before never_direct, right?
Yes. Or to be mor
"squid -k parse" shows no output.
Thanks!
Peyyetir
- Original Message -
From: Henrik Nordstrom
To: Rohit Peyyeti ; Hermann Strassner
Cc: Squid Mailinglist
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 10:27 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] fileupload restriction
On Thursday 07 August 2003 15.21, Ro
Onethine make sure that if the host name are same your Squid process will
not killed up. if you are using UNIX of *NIX os then same name is not the
issue becoz squid does not rely on netbios name. yes if you are using DNS
same name it can be problem..
for more you will have to let us know...
which
Hi,
Well it starts, I can see it in the ps -A list but it won't accelerate
the configured webpage (cannot display page when trying to reach it).
Then I can start it again and again, and the amount of squid processes
in the ps -A list get bigger. If the squid program would exit on start up
I wou
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 06:16, Jim Flowers wrote:
> OK, I think I'm just about done with this. I can handle requests for fixed-
> ip and virtual ip-based hosts on different networks and servers but not name-
> based virtual hosts using:
>
> http_port ip:80 vhost defaultsite=www.mymaindomain.com
>
Did you try "no ip route-cache" on the 7200 FastEthernet Interface (the
interface wich sends/receives wccp GRE packets to/from your Squid box.
Val
==
Valentin S. Chopov, CC[ND]P
Sys/Net Admin
SEI Data Inc.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
Newbie query:
Is there a patch to 2.5.x or code on the horizon to stipulate
compressed cache-to-cache transfers of parent hits?
Since I'm clueless on the actual mechanics, this may be a silly request,
although it seems useful between an ISP and small LAN over a phone line.
Thanks for any info.
Hi,
I am just wonder why you are not using diskd.
Based on Benchmarking that I read, diskd provides faster I/O performance.
I am planning to run squid on Linux Redhat 9.0 and thinking to use ext3 and diskd.
Thanks,
Nooshin
-Original Message-
From: Tay Teck Wee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sen
Ok, i just found out that the winbind deamon was the "old" one from the SuSE
rpm package 2.2.7a but I have installed Samba 2.2.8a.
The wbinfo -a returned an error with the 2.2.7a.
After deinstallation of the samba client with the winbind deamon, I
reinstalled
Samba with these options again:
--with
Hi,
I think I found the error, I found a "DNS lookup test failed"
error in the cache.log file, with a terminated abnormally
error.
Thanks for the advice,
Colin
I know that ext3 uses a lot more CPU on a lot of disk I/O. This is a
known issue.
Btw, did you compile the Squid with the gnu-regex option? Because that
one is faster on Linux systems. (if you're using a lot of acl's)
rgrds,
BArt
Tay Teck Wee wrote:
Hi Bart,
I'm using reiserfs. aufs c
Yes,
Two-Three ACL's are working simultaneously.
I stopped squid and restarted again. Cache size is
reduced to 25 % of
previous. May be due to this now squid is giving good
performance.
Is it necessary to reduce cache size once it reaches
to particular
limit?
Is changing IDE hard disk to SCSI
For caching disks:-
in order of preference for performance
1)volume(best, unless your data REALLY critical, then
go down the list)
2)raid 1(mirror, very costly)
3)raid 5
4)raid 0(i was surprised when i first heard it, can't
quite remember the reason)
--
Wolf
--- Adam Aube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
> The application opens in a java applet after the user is
> authenticated to the app. Before the user is able to enter all of
> the needed data (about two minutes time) the connection is lost
> and we get some kind of timeout error.
I'm going to guess that this application uses a persistent
conne
Hi,
I have proxy setup to authenticate users via NTLM for internet access. I
can't seem to able to allow local users to bypass authentication for
localsubnets http access. May I asked what ACL I need to set?
Regards,
Norman
external_acl_type NT_global_group %LOGIN /usr/lib/squid/wb_group
acl Pr
I have a new machine to test squid in it. I only have 40 gig hard drive
with 750MB RAM, will null fs with a cache_mem of 250MB could give me a
higher hit rate compared to a 250MB cache_mem with a 3gig cache_dir, or with
a 250MB with a 100MB cache_dir, since i want to lessen I/O bound operations
on
> These are allowed.
>
> Which rules dud you have which you think should have blocked this?
acl msn_no_block src 10.167.211.11/255.255.255.255
acl msn_server req_mime_type ^application/x-msn-messenger
# acl msn_server dstdomain gateway.messenger.hotmail.com
# acl msn_server dst 207.46.110.0/255
Tay,
Tay Teck Wee wrote:
Hi,
I did a telnet to my squid port 8080 and input an
invalid request n got the following reply(truncated):-
HTTP/1.0 400 Bad Request
Server: squid/2.5.STABLE3line 2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 17:52:22 GMT
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Len
On Thursday 07 August 2003 19.50, Wallace, Brian S. wrote:
> 1. It looks like transparent caching and WCCP would both bypass the
> load balancing currently being done by the ServerIron. Is this
> correct?
Yes.
> 2. Are there other ways to do load balancing and still use the
> VirusWall?
The us
Henrik,
I think what you suspect is absolutely correct. Few days ago, I upgraded the
BIOS / Firmware of my System board. As I read the news release from the
vendor that they remove one feature in the new firmware; it is UDMA-6
support. As ICH4 does not support it (I don't know what it is).
Howeve
will suggest better to tune you system via kernel and system BIOS. If you
have upgraded your BIOS you will have to reinstall OS due to hardware
addresses. I will suggest if you are using Red Hat Linux 7.3 no need to
upgrade Kernel. Linux 7.3 by default have patchec and tuned kernel which is
useful
Hzllo,
Why not using Reiser instead of ext3 with diskd?
I read a lot of articles that are saying that reiser is much fast for
Squid. (a lot of 'small files')
Bart
Zand, Nooshin wrote:
Hi,
I am just wonder why you are not using diskd.
Based on Benchmarking that I read, diskd provides fa
Hi,
When I ran ftp through squid proxy content-length is missing.
Thanks,
Nooshin
here is the out put.
HTTP/1.0 200 OK
Server: Squid/2.4.STABLE7
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 22:24:27 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain
Last-Modified: Fri, 30 May 2003 23:27:33 GMT
> But it is slow. The page gets loaded in say 30 secs instead of
> usual 8-10 secs.
When we used our proxy transparently, then switched to specifying a
proxy server, I noticed a dramatic speed increase. I think the NAT
adds latency to the connection.
Try specifying a proxy server and see if the
30 matches
Mail list logo
