Re: [squid-users] squid 3.1.0.13 performance results ready - reverse proxy - (2.6.x vs 3.1.x) - need help

2009-10-21 Thread Amos Jeffries
GaneshKumar Natarajan wrote: Thanks Amos. Is this with the gzip feature already enabled? NO. gzip is not enabled in 3.1 and also client doesnt send accept-encoding. the request are typically the same that was sent to 2.6 version. Is the web server agent sending chunked replies? NO both

[squid-users] squid 3.1.0.13 performance results ready - reverse proxy - (2.6.x vs 3.1.x) - need help

2009-10-20 Thread GaneshKumar Natarajan
We wanted to evaluate 3.1.0.13 squid to move from our current squid version of 2.6.x ( stable 4 + few custom changes ) We did the following performance test from a Avalance setup. 1. preload objects in squid cache. 2. 3500 transactions/sec with 90-10 hit-miss ratio. 3. mean size of object 23 kb.

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.1.0.13 performance results ready - reverse proxy - (2.6.x vs 3.1.x) - need help

2009-10-20 Thread Amos Jeffries
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:43:05 -0400, GaneshKumar Natarajan itisg...@gmail.com wrote: We wanted to evaluate 3.1.0.13 squid to move from our current squid version of 2.6.x ( stable 4 + few custom changes ) We did the following performance test from a Avalance setup. 1. preload objects in

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.1.0.13 performance results ready - reverse proxy - (2.6.x vs 3.1.x) - need help

2009-10-20 Thread GaneshKumar Natarajan
Thanks Amos. Is this with the gzip feature already enabled? NO. gzip is not enabled in 3.1 and also client doesnt send accept-encoding. the request are typically the same that was sent to 2.6 version. Is the web server agent sending chunked replies? NO both could be noticeably slower as the