[SR-Users] Re: Roadmap to next major Kamailio release series v5.8.x

2024-02-15 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla via sr-users
Hello, hopefully the devel version is now more stabilized after the freezing, the new components being adjusted enough not to need many more changes. Therefore I consider to branch 5.8 out of devel version next week on Friday, February 23, 2024, sometime around noon UTC. After that the master

[SR-Users] Dispatcher ping: "binding to source address X.X.X.X:XXXX failed: Address already in use" for TCP and TLS destinations

2024-02-15 Thread Jardar Leira via sr-users
We have recently upgraded from 5.6.4 to 5.7.4. No change in the KAMAILIO configuration. On all upgraded servers we are now getting this message in the logs for every destination when the dispatcher sends out OPTIONS to destinations listed in the dispatcher list: WARNING:

[SR-Users] Re: Reject TCP SYN

2024-02-15 Thread David Villasmil via sr-users
Thanks Karsten, That won’t work for me with TLS clients, which is what I’m trying to do. I’m making a PR with a new tcp param. Thanks! Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.w...@gmail.com phone: +34669448337 On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 17:42, Karsten Horsmann wrote: > Hi David, > > I

[SR-Users] Re: uac/uacreg - is it possible to force a REGISTER for an existing l_uuid

2024-02-15 Thread Sergiu Pojoga via sr-users
I don't think you can send a REGISTER immediately, like literally the same moment, with any of the RPC commands. There's a Kamailio UAC REG timer that processes records at certain intervals like reg_timer_interval() modparam. It also depends on reg_random_delay() and/or per uuid reg_delay values.

[SR-Users] Re: Kamailio as a Presence server only

2024-02-15 Thread djcsalvador--- via sr-users
Once Again, Thank you very much. I'll try to dig a little more before making more "stupid" questions! :) Cheers, David __ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to

[SR-Users] Re: Reject TCP SYN

2024-02-15 Thread Karsten Horsmann via sr-users
Hi David, I have most of my setups with OPTIONS pings (upstream carrier and myself). If I want to fade out a Kamailio I set the option response to an not 200 value (like 603 or whatever) and my internal and the external system didn't bring in new invites but leave the currently running out. You

[SR-Users] Re: Latest point releases seem to break early dialog UPDATEs from B-side when using topos (again)

2024-02-15 Thread Karsten Horsmann via sr-users
Hi George, if you think it's a issue please fill a bug report on Github to let the Devs investigate. Also the questions in the form ask for all what they need. Thank you George Diamantopoulos via sr-users schrieb am Do., 15. Feb. 2024, 16:06: > Update: I have just downgraded to 5.6.4 using >

[SR-Users] uac/uacreg - is it possible to force a REGISTER for an existing l_uuid

2024-02-15 Thread Aymeric Moizard via sr-users
Hi List, I would like to know if it's possible in my kamailio script to force an immediate REGISTER for an existing entry using l_uuid If I'm correct, uac_reg_refresh(luuid)is an API to reload into the database but doesn't send a REGISTER immediately. Is there an existing API available from

[SR-Users] Re: Kamailio as a Presence server only

2024-02-15 Thread Henning Westerholt via sr-users
Hello, you can find the tables and their mapping to the modules e.g. here: https://kamailio.org/docs/db-tables/kamailio-db-5.6.x.html The subscriber table is usually used for authentication purposes in kamailio. Cheers, Henning > -Original Message- > From: djcsalvador--- via sr-users

[SR-Users] Re: Kamailio as a Presence server only

2024-02-15 Thread djcsalvador--- via sr-users
Hi Henning, Thanks a lot for your reply, and for the time spent. I'm currently following the tutorial and trying to install Kamailio on our local environment, and I've faced with another question. For what i can see, there is a subscriber table, which stores user information. If we want

[SR-Users] Re: Latest point releases seem to break early dialog UPDATEs from B-side when using topos (again)

2024-02-15 Thread George Diamantopoulos via sr-users
Update: I have just downgraded to 5.6.4 using https://deb-archive.kamailio.org/repos/kamailio-5.6.4 I have confirmed that topos works correctly with this version, so the commit that broke things happened between 5.6.4 and 5.6.5 It might be related to how multi-homed installations interact with

[SR-Users] Re: Kamailio - handover between LTE and Wifi

2024-02-15 Thread Markus Monka via sr-users
Hi, check out open5gs as MME or PGW. Regarding ePDG, there is activity in the osmocom Project, maybe you can put these two projects together: https://osmocom.org/projects/osmo-epdg, Otherwise there are references in strongswan for ePDG, but i did not hat the time to play around., Markus On Thu,

[SR-Users] Latest point releases seem to break early dialog UPDATEs from B-side when using topos (again)

2024-02-15 Thread George Diamantopoulos via sr-users
Hello all, I've noticed that there seems to be a regression with the topos module, more specifically the redis flavour, but I'm assuming the storage backend shouldn't make a difference. I have confirmed this affects both 5.6.5 and 5.7-nightly, so I'm assuming some backported commit is to blame.

[SR-Users] Re: Kamailio - handover between LTE and Wifi

2024-02-15 Thread Christian Hahn via sr-users
Hi Carsten, thank you very much for your fast reply! Good to know that from IMS point of view it is fairly simple, but as far as I know it is more complex for MME, PGW and ePDG. May you know any Open Source Mobile Core which is supporting VoLTE <-> VoWiFi HO with Kamailio? Unfortunately, I am

[SR-Users] Re: Kamailio as a Presence server only

2024-02-15 Thread Henning Westerholt via sr-users
Hello, regarding your questions: 1. Besides from the Kamailio core, you only need to use the modules that are actually necessary for your configuration. There are over 220 modules, so they are of course not always used. 2. Can't comment with too much detail here, but generally speaking,

[SR-Users] Re: Kamailio - handover between LTE and Wifi

2024-02-15 Thread Carsten Bock via sr-users
Hi, The handover between VoWifi and VoLTE is fairly simple, as it has little to do with IMS. Technically speaking, the data session is migrated from the PGW (LTE) to the ePDG (Wifi), using GTP on the S2b interface. The device keeps it's IP address and the the handover is fully transparent to the

[SR-Users] Kamailio - handover between LTE and Wifi

2024-02-15 Thread Christian Hahn via sr-users
Hi all, While researching for Open Source IMS Services I’v found the presentation “What’s up with IMS & VoLTE?” at KamailioWorld 2018. There is a quote that raises a question: “Things, you shouldn’t expect (at least initially): ● Seamless handover between LTE and Wifi, as this requires some