Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] topoh, angle brackets and Contact URI params interpretation

2011-02-03 Thread Andrew Pogrebennyk
On 03.02.2011 10:26, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote: I think the topoh module should force the angle brackets. BTW it seems that parameter needs to be urlencoded, see rule 'other-param' in RFC 3261 section 25.1: From what I understand the valid form is: Contact:

Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] topoh, angle brackets and Contact URI params interpretation

2011-02-03 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 2/3/11 1:36 PM, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote: On 03.02.2011 10:26, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote: I think the topoh module should force the angle brackets. BTW it seems that parameter needs to be urlencoded, see rule 'other-param' in RFC 3261 section 25.1: From what I understand the valid

Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] topoh, angle brackets and Contact URI params interpretation

2011-02-03 Thread Andrew Pogrebennyk
On 03.02.2011 18:12, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: I will check the sources and fix if the contact address is not between . However, I do not undeerstand where you got the @, is none there or am I missing something? Daniel, Sorry, I meant the * sign. Thanks for looking into it. --