Dear Kamailio'ns,
I am awaiting somebody's suggestions/hints/comments on this issue, with that
i can proceed further.
Please anybody help me in resolving this issue.
Any help will mean a lot and greatly appreciate.
Regards,
Ravi
--
View this message in context:
It looks like you may be running Kamailio behind NAT as well, no?
Can you provide any traffic on the connections that fail?
Fred Posner
The Palner Group, Inc.
503-914-0999 (direct)
954-472-2896 (fax)
On 04/03/2014 08:44 AM, Ravi wrote:
Dear Kamailio'ns,
I am awaiting somebody's
Dear Kamailio'ns,
I am working on Kamailio server (V 4.1.2) with RTPproxy (1.2.1) integrated,
in a standalone intranet infrastructure (no any connection with internet).
I dont have any NAT settings in my network set-up. even though i will not
get Audio/video calls through some times. So in that
Hi All,
I installed Kamailio server on my ubuntu machine. And installed rtpproxy
also in the same machine. I didm't make many changes to default
configuration files, kamctlrc and kamailio.cfg. Now I am able to
communicate between two SIP clients, if both sip clients are in the same
LAN. But I am
Did you try this;
http://www.palner.com/blog/303/kamailio-behind-nat/#more-303
Regards,
Arun
From: Neo Quartz neoqua...@gmail.com
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] NAT traversal problem
Hi,
We have a solution which requires only outbound NAT on SIP calls.
Do you have a product which would solve the NAT Traversal problem on the
outbound SIP calls?
If yes, how much would be the cost of this product?
Will it support 2000 simultaneous calls?
BR//
Hi,
To enable nat traversal execute RTPProxy.
http://www.rtpproxy.org
It supports many thousand calls
--
Laurent PIERRE
On 18 April 2013 16:04, Ishan Sawhney ishan.sawh...@yahoo.in wrote:
Hi,
We have a solution which requires only outbound NAT on SIP calls.
Do you have a product which
will it be work on NAT
Thanks
Jagan
On 19 April 2013 08:40, PIERRE Laurent ltpie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
To enable nat traversal execute RTPProxy.
http://www.rtpproxy.org
It supports many thousand calls
--
Laurent PIERRE
On 18 April 2013 16:04, Ishan Sawhney
Hello,
great, thanks for replying and closing the thread with the solution.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 12/19/12 2:31 AM, Raj Roy Ghandhi wrote:
Hi All,
Problem solved.
It was a CODEC issue.
Best Regards,
Roy.
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Raj Roy Ghandhi roy.gan...@gmail.com
Hi All,
Problem solved.
It was a CODEC issue.
Best Regards,
Roy.
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Raj Roy Ghandhi roy.gan...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
My Kamalio development version works very well with websocket and webrtc
clients.
But when I try to call the guy in remote area (he had connected
Hi,
I am trying to communicate 2 Jitsi clients in 2 separate private networks.
Both clients are behind NAT.
Kamailio Server is on Public IP.
Both Jitsi clients does register and presence works fine. And also text
messages works well.
But unable to call each other.
Had some one had the same issue
Hello,
you have to do nat traversal for signaling and rtp relaying for media
streams. Default configuration file for kamailio includes the solution
for this case, using nathelper and rtpproxy. Looking into kamailio.cfg
for WITH_NAT token.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 12/14/12 7:37 PM, Raj Roy Ghandhi
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the reply.
I am using that flag WITH_NAT and RTPProxy.
Please find my config file at http://pastebin.ca/2293600 and let me know I
have miss anything there.
Best Regards,
Roy.
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
mico...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
My Kamalio development version works very well with websocket and webrtc
clients.
But when I try to call the guy in remote area (he had connected to the same
server with 3G dongle) no voice and video.
Here is how I have set it up.
1. Kamailio 3.4 development version running on public IP
2.
So, I've made resetup of network to run tests.
I've figured out, that one of the routers were changing SIP headers,
i.e. Contacts header to public IP. This caused UAC under this router not
to use STUN and gave one way audio.
Now I'm using fix_nated_contact and fix_nated_register. Location table
Hello,
one option might be a bad ALG implementation in the router.
Can you send a full ngrep of such case? You can obfuscate the IP
addresses, use different ones for each point in the network and leave
the ports. Seeing SIP headers and SDP can indicate the presence of an
ALG or something
Unfortunately ngrep is unavailable right now, cause network was
configured to use public IPs. May be I'll can do that on development
network later. Right now development network using public`s also.
I'll try to sort out ngrep anyway.
I was giving FAEI to INVITEs from UAC to Asterisk and FAIE to
On 3/2/11 9:32 AM, Spinov Evgeniy wrote:
Unfortunately ngrep is unavailable right now, cause network was
configured to use public IPs. May be I'll can do that on development
network later. Right now development network using public`s also.
I'll try to sort out ngrep anyway.
I was giving FAEI
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 09:53 +0100, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 3/2/11 9:32 AM, Spinov Evgeniy wrote:
Unfortunately ngrep is unavailable right now, cause network was
configured to use public IPs. May be I'll can do that on development
network later. Right now development network
May be I miss some important details? No suggestions?
Thank you.
Hello, all.
Using nathelper + rtpproxy for subj. Kamailio has public and private
network interfaces. Asterisk is only private. RTP Proxy is working in
bridge mode and relaying traffic from UAC to Asterisks.
Everything is
Hello, all.
Using nathelper + rtpproxy for subj. Kamailio has public and private
network interfaces. Asterisk is only private. RTP Proxy is working in
bridge mode and relaying traffic from UAC to Asterisks.
Everything is working fine, except one configuration. When the client is
behind router (
Hi there,
I've been setting up SER for a testing server on the local network behind a
NAT. I'm having problems understanding how to setup the NAT routing in the
configuration file.
My understanding is that IPTel has already setup advanced NAT routing on the
free service (as per the website).
Is
Hello
On 5/5/10 9:00 AM, Andy Savage wrote:
Hi there,
I've been setting up SER for a testing server on the local network
behind a NAT. I'm having problems understanding how to setup the NAT
routing in the configuration file.
My understanding is that IPTel has already setup advanced NAT
23 matches
Mail list logo
