Re: [SR-Users] fix_nated_contact() on REGISTER

2010-06-02 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 6/2/10 10:58 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote: Am 02.06.2010 10:46, schrieb Klaus Darilion: Am 01.06.2010 22:08, schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla: On 6/1/10 10:02 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote: Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: On 6/1/10 9:07 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: No, it'll store the fixed

Re: [SR-Users] fix_nated_contact() on REGISTER

2010-06-02 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 6/2/10 3:00 PM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote: [...] On 6/1/10 9:07 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: No, it'll store the fixed one, in the proper contact column, not the received column. I do this all the time, even though it's not the proper way. should be the

Re: [SR-Users] fix_nated_contact() on REGISTER

2010-06-02 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: I think Juha added a new way lately, to encode/decode source ip/port in the contact uri. yes, but that only replaces with fix_nated_contact and can be used if someone wants to re-use tcp connections between proxy and UAs and wants to always deliver to UAs

Re: [SR-Users] fix_nated_contact() on REGISTER

2010-06-01 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 6/1/10 10:02 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote: Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: On 6/1/10 9:07 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: No, it'll store the fixed one, in the proper contact column, not the received column. I do this all the time, even though it's not the proper way. should be the original one