[SR-Users] kamailio and presence_xml parse error

2010-04-30 Thread Francesco
Hi to all. I'm new here. I'm getting crazy with presence_xml error. I'm using kamailio 1.5.4 notls with xlite 3.0 (winXP client) softphone and postgresql 8.4 as db backend. Seems that presence works, but i have error in parsing xml: those are the relevant log: Apr 29 16:42:54 ocs

[SR-Users] Wrong handling CANCEL message

2010-04-30 Thread pars3c
Hi, i have a problem about the handling of the cancel message. The call flow is this: A - (Invite)Proxy (P) B (100 Tryng) --- -(Invite) B (100 Tryng)

[SR-Users] old mailing lists serusers

2010-04-30 Thread Pavel Kasparek
Hello all, the email address for old iptel.org mailing list serus...@lists.iptel.org (and serus...@iptel.org) is now forwarded to the new sip-router project mailing list sr-us...@lists.sip-router.org. Pavel iptel.org ___ SIP Express Router (SER)

Re: [SR-Users] Wrong handling CANCEL message

2010-04-30 Thread Klaus Darilion
Am 30.04.2010 11:37, schrieb Iñaki Baz Castillo: 2010/4/30 Klaus Darilionklaus.mailingli...@pernau.at: 200 OK seems correct as long as the transaction is still in memory. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#section-9.2 I don't agree. As per RFC 3261 when a proxy receives a 200 for an INVITE

Re: [SR-Users] Wrong handling CANCEL message

2010-04-30 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2010/4/30 Klaus Darilion klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at: I don't agree. As per RFC 3261 when a proxy receives a 200 for an INVITE the transaction is terminated so a CANCEL after the 200 should not match such transaction. Then the proxy should reply 481 to the CANCEL rather than a 200.   If

Re: [SR-Users] Wrong handling CANCEL message

2010-04-30 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2010/4/30 Iñaki Baz Castillo i...@aliax.net: But anyway, if the INVITE has been replied with a 200 it makes no sense at all to send a CANCEL so the proxy shouldn't reply 200 to the CANCEL, but a 481. Not exactly, sorry, the proxy should forward the CANCEL stateless: 16.10 CANCEL Processing

Re: [SR-Users] Wrong handling CANCEL message

2010-04-30 Thread Jiri Kuthan
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: 2010/4/30 Klaus Darilion klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at: 200 OK seems correct as long as the transaction is still in memory. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#section-9.2 I don't agree. As per RFC 3261 when a proxy receives a 200 for an INVITE the transaction is

Re: [SR-Users] Add header on failure Route

2010-04-30 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 4/30/10 11:07 AM, Alex Rendour wrote: Hi, We need to add header on the failure route. Exemple: On failure 404 Not found, we need add header Reason: Q.850; cause=1 We tried this in failure_route: if(t_check_status(404)){ xlog(L_ERR, 404 Not found\n);

Re: [SR-Users] Wrong handling CANCEL message

2010-04-30 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2010/4/30 Jiri Kuthan j...@iptel.org: I don't agree. As per RFC 3261 when a proxy receives a 200 for an INVITE the transaction is terminated so a CANCEL after the 200 should not match such transaction. That's a bug in the RFC and we shall not better projects RFC bugs in implementations :) A

[SR-Users] t_on_failure to named failure route

2010-04-30 Thread Steven C. Blair
I'm attempting to run an existing SER config file under a recent build of sip-router. I get a syntax error on the t_on_failure(noroute) call that exists in my config file. The specific error is bad expression: type mismatch (str instead of int). I presume this means sip-router does not

Re: [SR-Users] t_on_failure to named failure route

2010-04-30 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 4/30/10 7:58 PM, Steven C. Blair wrote: I'm attempting to run an existing SER config file under a recent build of sip-router. I get a syntax error on the t_on_failure(noroute) call that exists in my config file. The specific error is bad expression: type mismatch (str instead of

Re: [SR-Users] t_on_failure to named failure route

2010-04-30 Thread Steven C. Blair
The error is produced within the following block per the config file syntax check -c. if (method==INVITE !...@to.tag) { t_on_failure(FAILURE_ROUTE); } From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 2:09 PM To: Steven C. Blair Cc:

Re: [SR-Users] openser as SIP AS in IMS environment...

2010-04-30 Thread Jignesh Gandhi
Hello All, Can openser be used as a SIP Application Server in an IMS infrastructure ? Should I use Kamailio instead ? thanks, --Jignesh ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org

Re: [SR-Users] openser as SIP AS in IMS environment...

2010-04-30 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2010/4/30 Jignesh Gandhi jignesh.gan...@moviuscorp.com: Hello All, Can openser be used as a SIP Application Server in an IMS infrastructure ? Should I use Kamailio instead ? By definition a SIP proxy is not a SIP Application Server(which in most cases are B2BUA's). However if you mean a IMS

Re: [SR-Users] t_on_failure to named failure route

2010-04-30 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 4/30/10 8:11 PM, Steven C. Blair wrote: The error is produced within the following block per the config file syntax check -c. if (method==INVITE !...@to.tag) { t_on_failure(FAILURE_ROUTE); } not using selects in this way but via PV framework, but I think

Re: [SR-Users] openser as SIP AS in IMS environment...

2010-04-30 Thread Alex Balashov
On 04/30/2010 02:12 PM, Jignesh Gandhi wrote: Hello All, Can openser be used as a SIP Application Server in an IMS infrastructure ? Should I use Kamailio instead ? Jignesh, note that these days when you are talking about Kamailio and OpenSER, they are one and the same. -- Alex Balashov -

Re: [SR-Users] [Kamailio-Users] PCRE Regex / Transformations Bug?

2010-04-30 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hi Brandon, you are missing the multi-line matching flag, try: xlog(L_INFO, [$ci] $(rb{re.subst,/^(.*)m=audio ([0-9]+)(.*)$/\2/s})) Note the 's' after the last '/' in subst expression. Cheers, Daniel On 4/29/10 10:21 PM, Brandon Armstead wrote: Daniel, Here is the XLOG output, the top log

Re: [SR-Users] Bug with avp's or feature ?

2010-04-30 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 4/26/10 5:59 PM, Tristan Mahé wrote: Hi guys, I was debugging an install on kamailio 3.0, and was asked to add per user custom outbound proxies. To do so, I used load_credentials from auth_db to store the custom route in an avp, as you can see in the relevant part below. I

Re: [SR-Users] openser as SIP AS in IMS environment...

2010-04-30 Thread Jeff Brower
Daniel- On 4/30/10 8:24 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: 2010/4/30 Jignesh Gandhijignesh.gan...@moviuscorp.com: Hello All, Can openser be used as a SIP Application Server in an IMS infrastructure ? Should I use Kamailio instead ? By definition a SIP proxy is not a SIP Application

[SR-Users] sr-users = ser + kamailio users mailing lists

2010-04-30 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, a short note that the merging of SIP Express Routers (SER) users mailing list into sr-users is completed from subscriber point of view: - posts to serus...@lists.iptel.org are directed to sr-users@lists.sip-router.org - posts to sr-users@lists.sip-router.org are received by subscribers

Re: [SR-Users] openser as SIP AS in IMS environment...

2010-04-30 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 4/30/10 10:08 PM, Jeff Brower wrote: Daniel- On 4/30/10 8:24 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: 2010/4/30 Jignesh Gandhijignesh.gan...@moviuscorp.com: Hello All, Can openser be used as a SIP Application Server in an IMS infrastructure ? Should I use Kamailio instead ?

Re: [SR-Users] RTPproxy in bridge mode question

2010-04-30 Thread Uriel Rozenbaum
Daniel, Maybe my question is silly, but in this case the contact should remain intact? (I mean in bridge mode). I understand the destination UA should read the Record-route Headers and ignore the contents of the Contact Header, but I think this is not what´s happening. I'm not using force_socket

Re: [SR-Users] RTPproxy in bridge mode question

2010-04-30 Thread Ovidiu Sas
It sucks to deal with broken SIP implementation on the carrier side. Here's one thing that you can try. You can encode the contact: http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules_k/siputils.html#id2596873 Like this you will have the public IP in the Contact header. Then, for all subsequent

Re: [SR-Users] openser as SIP AS in IMS environment...

2010-04-30 Thread Jignesh Gandhi
thank you for your reply. Would you know of anything that can be used as a SIP Application Server with capability to do REFER, RE-Invites and parse SIP-I payload passed to the server. OpenIMS has SIP AS as an external entity. thanks, --Jignesh -Original Message- From: Iñaki Baz

Re: [SR-Users] openser as SIP AS in IMS environment...

2010-04-30 Thread Alex Balashov
SEMS? On 04/30/2010 04:31 PM, Jignesh Gandhi wrote: thank you for your reply. Would you know of anything that can be used as a SIP Application Server with capability to do REFER, RE-Invites and parse SIP-I payload passed to the server. OpenIMS has SIP AS as an external entity. thanks,