Re: [SR-Users] Wrong handling CANCEL message

2010-05-04 Thread Henning Westerholt
On Monday 03 May 2010, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: We just drop them. In the sr configuration i think there is also a similar method implemented (etc/sip-router.cfg, route[CATCH_CANCEL]). In the past on our systems we've tried to forward them stateless, but this created some loop conditions,

Re: [SR-Users] Wrong handling CANCEL message

2010-05-04 Thread Alex Hermann
On Friday 30 April 2010 13:25:13 Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: Yes, I agree. In fact draft invfix solves it by adding a new state Accepted so when a 200 is sent the server transaction remains in memory for a while (to absorbe INVITE retransmissions). But anyway the transaction is in Accepted

Re: [SR-Users] RTPproxy in bridge mode question

2010-05-04 Thread Klaus Darilion
I have no idea ... :-( Am 04.05.2010 15:41, schrieb Uriel Rozenbaum: Thanks Guys, I'll be trying this. Do you know if I can use AVP or vars as parameters for these functions? |encode_contact(encoding_prefix) ||decode_contact()| On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Klaus Darilion

Re: [SR-Users] RTPproxy in bridge mode question

2010-05-04 Thread Ovidiu Sas
No AVPs or vars. The encoding field separator can be specified via params: http://sip-router.org/docbook/sip-router/branch/master/modules_k/siputils/siputils.html#id2574949 Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Uriel Rozenbaum uriel.rozenb...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Guys, I'll be