Hello,
I was thinking that if i store the contacts that are registered into my
proxy in a database, like this:
.
.
# - usrloc params -
modparam(usrloc, db_mode, 3)
.
.
if (is_method(REGISTER))
{
if (!save(location))
sl_reply_error();
exit;
}
.
.
This way i
Would be possible.
Have a look at DRBD!
Von: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org
[mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] Im Auftrag von Danny Dias
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2011 11:20
An: kamailio
Betreff: Re: [SR-Users] Redundancy between 2 Kamailio servers
Hello,
I
On 02/02/2011 12:20 PM, Danny Dias wrote:
Hello,
I was thinking that if i store the contacts that are registered into
my proxy in a database, like this:
.
.
# - usrloc params -
modparam(usrloc, db_mode, 3)
.
.
if (is_method(REGISTER))
{
if (!save(location))
Am 27.01.2011 13:05, schrieb Alex Hermann:
On Thursday 27 January 2011, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Am 27.01.2011 11:21, schrieb Danny Dias:
I've read some difficulty in the synchronisation of registrations because
Kamailio works best when it stores registrations in memory and
registrations are
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, you wrote:
Am 27.01.2011 13:05, schrieb Alex Hermann:
On Thursday 27 January 2011, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Am 27.01.2011 11:21, schrieb Danny Dias:
I've read some difficulty in the synchronisation of registrations
because Kamailio works best when it stores
Am 02.02.2011 15:24, schrieb Alex Hermann:
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, you wrote:
Am 27.01.2011 13:05, schrieb Alex Hermann:
On Thursday 27 January 2011, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Am 27.01.2011 11:21, schrieb Danny Dias:
I've read some difficulty in the synchronisation of registrations
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Am 02.02.2011 15:24, schrieb Alex Hermann:
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, you wrote:
Alex, what happens if one server is down. There will be lots of
replication transactions which will timeout. Can this cause any
problems if there are
Am 27.01.2011 13:05, schrieb Alex Hermann:
Yes - the problem with SIP based replication is that both proxies must
be running. This is a problem as Kamailio binds to the virtual IP at
start up - thus adding the virtual IP address to the backup server does
not make Backup-Kamailio
Darilion
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. Januar 2011 15:18
An: Alex Hermann
Cc: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Betreff: Re: [SR-Users] Redundancy between 2 Kamailio servers
Am 27.01.2011 13:05, schrieb Alex Hermann:
Yes - the problem with SIP based replication is that both proxies must
be running
On 01/27/2011 04:15 PM, Danny Dias wrote:
Thanks Alex...
2011/1/27 Alex Hermann a...@speakup.nl mailto:a...@speakup.nl
On Thursday 27 January 2011, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Am 27.01.2011 11:21, schrieb Danny Dias:
I've read some difficulty in the synchronisation of
Am 27.01.2011 13:05, schrieb Alex Hermann:
On Thursday 27 January 2011, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Am 27.01.2011 11:21, schrieb Danny Dias:
I've read some difficulty in the synchronisation of registrations
because
Kamailio works best when it stores registrations in memory and
On Thursday 27 January 2011, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Alex, do you also do NAT keep-alive from the proxies? If yes, are you
sending them from both servers at the same time?
No, we require clients to sent nat-keepalives. It is much more efficient. In
addition, the registrars are not directly
2011/1/27 Klaus Darilion klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at:
Is it possible to bind Kamailio to an IP address which is not active?
(e.g. start Kamailio on the backup server)
Yes, it depends on a sysctl option of the kernel (I don't remember the
name, sorry). With such option set you can make a server
2011/1/27 Danny Dias ing.diasda...@gmail.com:
Do you mean that both Kamailio-1 and Kamailio-2 will be as primary server?
and the clients will register in the 2 machines? and also they will bind to
the ip of the HA? sorry my friend but i do not understand very well, i'm
quite new with redundant
Thanks Iñaki,
2011/1/27 Iñaki Baz Castillo i...@aliax.net
2011/1/27 Danny Dias ing.diasda...@gmail.com:
Do you mean that both Kamailio-1 and Kamailio-2 will be as primary
server?
and the clients will register in the 2 machines? and also they will bind
to
the ip of the HA? sorry my
15 matches
Mail list logo
