On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 09:19 +0100, steve wrote:
Hi
We have similar (nothing deep) nesting and had similar issues on
openSUSE with 1.9.5. It seems to be fixed on 1.11.x. It's a real pain to
build and install but you could do us all a big favour by putting
pressure on SUSE to get up to date
-Original Message-
From: sssd-devel-boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org [mailto:sssd-devel-
boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of steve
Sent: Wednesday, 4 December 2013 6:20 PM
To: sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Subject: Re: [SSSD] problem with AD nested group expansion, maybe?
-Original Message-
From: sssd-devel-boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org [mailto:sssd-devel-
boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of steve
Sent: Wednesday, 4 December 2013 6:22 PM
To: sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Subject: Re: [SSSD] problem with AD nested group expansion, maybe?
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
Tell you what: You get RHEL to include it and I'll push SUSE about SLES. I
mean 6.5 just came out and they did not
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:01:27PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 05:55:44PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:50:35PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:51:41AM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
Steeve found some issues when
Hi there
I grabbed the sources for the 1.11.2 release (
https://fedorahosted.org/released/sssd/sssd-1.11.2.tar.gz) and tried to
build the rpm packages on a CentOS 6.4 (2.6.32-358.23.2.el6.x86_64) and it
fails because of the krb5_util tests and subsequent check_and_open tests.
I googled the error
As discussed in one of the threads on sssd-devel, it might be nice to
add a link an explanation on different LDAP search scopes.
From 7503dbad16762cd63a3b62b8c745aa7e3e94289f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:51:59 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2]
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 03:29:53PM -0800, Antek Baranski wrote:
Hi there
I grabbed the sources for the 1.11.2 release (
https://fedorahosted.org/released/sssd/sssd-1.11.2.tar.gz) and tried to
build the rpm packages on a CentOS 6.4 (2.6.32-358.23.2.el6.x86_64) and it
fails because of the
On (03/12/13 15:29), Antek Baranski wrote:
Hi there
I grabbed the sources for the 1.11.2 release (
https://fedorahosted.org/released/sssd/sssd-1.11.2.tar.gz) and tried to
build the rpm packages on a CentOS 6.4 (2.6.32-358.23.2.el6.x86_64) and it
fails because of the krb5_util tests and subsequent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/04/2013 08:58 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
As discussed in one of the threads on sssd-devel, it might be nice
to add a link an explanation on different LDAP search scopes.
Ack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 09:24:58AM +, greg.lehm...@csiro.au wrote:
Tell you what: You get RHEL to include it and I'll push SUSE about SLES. I
mean 6.5 just came out and they did not increase the version by even a minor
step over 6.4!
Version numbers mean nothing in the enterprise world. To
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 09:24:58AM +, greg.lehm...@csiro.au wrote:
-Original Message-
From: sssd-devel-boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org [mailto:sssd-devel-
boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of steve
Sent: Wednesday, 4 December 2013 6:20 PM
To:
ehlo,
struct nss_cmd_ctx was not released in function nss_cmd_setnetgrent_done
and it wasn't used in the other function, because getnetgrent creates its
own nss_cmd_ctx context. struct nss_cmd_ctx was released after closing client
because it was allocated under client context. Memory leak is
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 09:06:08AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/04/2013 08:58 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
As discussed in one of the threads on sssd-devel, it might be nice
to add a link an explanation on different LDAP search scopes.
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 09:22:40PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 06:37:08PM +, Markos Chandras wrote:
Output from init scripts should go to a file (ideally in
/var/log directory) instead of stderr.
Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org
---
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 09:23:53PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 09:21:22PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 06:37:07PM +, Markos Chandras wrote:
Allow sssd to use the xdm wrapper so login managers can
use sssd to authenticate users.
On (04/12/13 16:42), steve wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 15:13 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 09:24:58AM +, greg.lehm...@csiro.au wrote:
Tell you what: You get RHEL to include it and I'll push SUSE about SLES. I
mean 6.5 just came out and they did not increase the
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 03:49:56PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:11:03PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:06:37PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 04:02:21PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Please see the simple attached patch. To
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:42:52AM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:01:27PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 05:55:44PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:50:35PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:51:41AM +0100,
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 07:41:19PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello,
first four patches address issues of freeing mt_svc structure. Last one
adds warns to syslog.
Pavel Reichl
The patches work well and the code looks good. I have a couple of very
small nitpicks, see inline.
From
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 05:22:06PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:42:52AM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:01:27PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 05:55:44PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:50:35PM +0100,
On 12/04/2013 12:14 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 07:41:19PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello,
first four patches address issues of freeing mt_svc structure. Last one
adds warns to syslog.
Pavel Reichl
The patches work well and the code looks good. I have a couple of very
Comments inline.
- Original Message -
On 12/03/2013 12:38 PM, Yassir Elley wrote:
Hi all,
I have written up a Design Document for GPO Integration with the AD Provider
[1]. The Document includes the design, as well as some Unresolved Issues.
Your review of the document would be
-Original Message-
From: sssd-devel-boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org [mailto:sssd-devel-
boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Hrozek
Sent: Thursday, 5 December 2013 12:14 AM
To: sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Subject: Re: [SSSD] problem with AD nested group expansion,
-Original Message-
From: sssd-devel-boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org [mailto:sssd-devel-
boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of steve
Sent: Thursday, 5 December 2013 1:43 AM
To: sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Subject: Re: [SSSD] problem with AD nested group expansion, maybe?
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 23:10 +, greg.lehm...@csiro.au wrote:
-Original Message-
From: sssd-devel-boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org [mailto:sssd-devel-
boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of steve
Sent: Thursday, 5 December 2013 1:43 AM
To: sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
On 12/04/2013 05:58 PM, Yassir Elley wrote:
2) IMO it should be stated as a clear non goal to create a pluggable CSE
framework on the client at least at the moment and extend it on case by case
basis.
Although the intent is to only implement one CSE plugin module for the first
On 12/04/2013 07:11 PM, steve wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 23:10 +, greg.lehm...@csiro.au wrote:
-Original Message-
From: sssd-devel-boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org [mailto:sssd-devel-
boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of steve
Sent: Thursday, 5 December 2013 1:43 AM
To:
On 12/04/2013 06:06 PM, greg.lehm...@csiro.au wrote:
-Original Message-
From: sssd-devel-boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org [mailto:sssd-devel-
boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Hrozek
Sent: Thursday, 5 December 2013 12:14 AM
To: sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 21:28 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
My point is that the whole page should be about AD access provider and
the GPO is its implementation detail not a generic mechanism.
There can be a separate page where you can describe how GPO generally
works and reference it. Right now the
-Original Message-
From: sssd-devel-boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org [mailto:sssd-devel-
boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Hrozek
Sent: Thursday, 5 December 2013 12:14 AM
To: sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Subject: Re: [SSSD] problem with AD nested group expansion,
31 matches
Mail list logo
