[SSSD] Ldap question: How to quickly see changes to a user's group list.

2014-03-24 Thread Mark London
Hi - We are running an LDAP server on a Windows box. We have a need for our Linux clients to be able to quickly see modifications we make to a user's account, i.e. adding a group to an account. The only way that I've found to be able to do this, is to set ldap_enumeration_refresh_timeout to a

Re: [SSSD] Default LDAP/SSSD timeouts are too slow if primary DNS is down. (Mark London)

2012-08-14 Thread Mark London
Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com wrote On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:16:49PM -0400, Mark London wrote: Mark London wrote: Hi - When our primary DNS is unreachable, SSSD with LDAP breaks, or is incredibly slow. I've traced it to the fact that several of the LDAP timeout values are 6

[SSSD] Default LDAP/SSSD timeouts are too slow if primary DNS is down.

2012-08-13 Thread Mark London
Hi - When our primary DNS is unreachable, SSSD with LDAP breaks, or is incredibly slow. I've traced it to the fact that several of the LDAP timeout values are 6 seconds. This is not long enough, because the default DNS timeout failover is 5 seconds. Incoming SSH connections are impossible

Re: [SSSD] Default LDAP/SSSD timeouts are too slow if primary DNS is down.

2012-08-13 Thread Mark London
Mark London wrote: Hi - When our primary DNS is unreachable, SSSD with LDAP breaks, or is incredibly slow. I've traced it to the fact that several of the LDAP timeout values are 6 seconds. This is not long enough, because the default DNS timeout failover is 5 seconds. Incoming SSH

[SSSD] why is the sssd_be process killed by the error The Monitor returned an error [org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply]

2012-08-03 Thread Mark London
Hi - We use SSSD with LDAP, and this morning we are having network problems, and for some reason, this was causing the sssd_be process to be killed. From the log file I see: (Fri Aug 3 11:31:34 2012) [sssd[be[PSFC]]] [id_callback] (0x0010): The Monitor returned an error

[SSSD] Memory leak with LDAP and frequent enumeration refreshes?

2012-07-05 Thread Mark London
sgall...@redhat.com wrote: Here is my solution to have a persistant uptodate local cache of all ldap entries, so as to avoid very long delays when a user issues a command that causes a large number of LDAP lookups, i.e. by doing a ls -l /home: enumerate = true enum_cache_timeout = 86400

Re: [SSSD] Very slow listing of files owned by many different, users. Any solution?

2012-06-28 Thread Mark London
sgall...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 13:18 -0400, Mark London wrote: Hi - We are running SSSD with LDAP at our site, where we have several hundred users. LDAP is being served by our Windows domain server. With entry_cache_timeout set to a short value, when someone does

[SSSD] Very slow listing of files owned by many different users. Any solution?

2012-06-27 Thread Mark London
Hi - We are running SSSD with LDAP at our site, where we have several hundred users. LDAP is being served by our Windows domain server. With entry_cache_timeout set to a short value, when someone does an operation that requires information for multiple users, i.e. listing the owners of all

[SSSD] Problem with LDAPS+TLS.

2012-01-30 Thread Mark London
Hi - We're using SSSD with LDAPS and TLS on redhat, and it's working fine. I just tried to make it work for unbuntu, but I can't get TLS to work. I get the following errors: (Mon Jan 30 14:36:09 2012) [sssd[be[PSFC]]] [sss_ldap_init_sys_connect_done] (1): ldap_install_tls failed: Connect

Re: [SSSD] sss_debuglevel doesn't work for LDAP logs?

2011-10-31 Thread Mark London
I'm not sure why, but completely restarting SSSD, has fixed the problem with sss_debuglevel. Now it seems to be working ok with. Strange. - Mark Mark London wrote: Hi - Is the sss_debuglevel command supposed to work with the sssd_be logs? I'm using LDAP, and while the command change

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Plug memory leaks in sysdb_ops. LOOKS FIXED.

2011-10-24 Thread Mark London
Thanks for the patches. It seems fixed now! Much appreciated. - Mark Jan Zelený wrote: Jakub - I figured out why my debug log file was empty. I only had debugging enabled for nss and pam! In any event, yes, I now see the memory leaks. My valgrind summary for sssd_be, after running it for a

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Plug memory leaks in sysdb_ops (Jakub Hrozek)

2011-10-23 Thread Mark London
Jakub - I figured out why my debug log file was empty. I only had debugging enabled for nss and pam! In any event, yes, I now see the memory leaks. My valgrind summary for sssd_be, after running it for a while, is: ==31457== LEAK SUMMARY: ==31457==definitely lost: 128,911 bytes in 1,312

Re: [SSSD] SSSD + CYRUS/IMAP + LDAP + NSS caching = constantly growing sssd_be memory usage?

2011-10-22 Thread Mark London
the sssd_PSFC.log file is empty. Is that normal to be empty, even with debug set to 10? I believe that's the log file that the sssd_be process logs to. - Mark d...@redhat.com wrote: On 10/21/2011 03:09 PM, Mark London wrote: Hi - I've compiled and installed the latest version of SSSD (1.6.1

[SSSD] SSSD + CYRUS/IMAP + LDAP + NSS caching = constantly growing sssd_be memory usage?

2011-10-21 Thread Mark London
Hi - I've compiled and installed the latest version of SSSD (1.6.1), with caching enabled, for a Redhat 6 computer running CYRUS IMAP mail server software (with SASL). Users are authenticated via LDAP, and the LDAP server is running as part of a Windows domain server. Mail is sent using