On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:04:25AM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 08:50:43PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 01:27:34PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/25/2010 12:31 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 02:07:00PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:04:25AM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 08:50:43PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 01:27:34PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/08/2010 08:40 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
This new version makes it a configuration error if both lists are
defined in the config file.
bye,
Sumit
Nack (though these are nitpicks)
I'd prefer it if the simple provider had its own subdirectory
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:50:38AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/08/2010 08:40 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
This new version makes it a configuration error if both lists are
defined in the config file.
bye,
Sumit
Nack (though
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 08:50:43PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 01:27:34PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/25/2010 12:31 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
this is the second try to fix #392. This patch adds a new
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 01:27:34PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/25/2010 12:31 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
this is the second try to fix #392. This patch adds a new provider
called simple wuth na access target which can allow/deny
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/25/2010 12:31 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
this is the second try to fix #392. This patch adds a new provider
called simple wuth na access target which can allow/deny access based on
a list of user names.
Nack.
You didn't update the
