-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/11/2010 10:43 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On 01/08/2010 09:55 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 01/08/2010 03:13 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 01/08/2010 05:10 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Please remove 'access' from krb5, too.
bye,
Sumit
New
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/08/2010 09:55 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 01/08/2010 03:13 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 01/08/2010 05:10 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Please remove 'access' from krb5, too.
bye,
Sumit
New patch attached, removing krb5 from the
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 12:04:01PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/07/2010 11:56 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552537
The entry for [provider/local/access] doesn't belong in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/08/2010 05:10 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Please remove 'access' from krb5, too.
bye,
Sumit
New patch attached, removing krb5 from the access_provider list.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/08/2010 03:13 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 01/08/2010 05:10 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Please remove 'access' from krb5, too.
bye,
Sumit
New patch attached, removing krb5 from the access_provider list.
Now, with patch attached...
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552537
The entry for [provider/local/access] doesn't belong in the list. We
have no special processing in the LOCAL provider for access control at
this time. We should just be defaulting to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/07/2010 11:56 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552537
The entry for [provider/local/access] doesn't belong in the list. We
have no special processing in the LOCAL provider for access control
