On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 21:53 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
First of all, these patches are definitely preliminary. I'm mainly
looking for input on whether I'm headed in the right direction.
This thread is now concluded. Discussion should continue in the new
thread [PATCHES] Add support for
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 03:01:17PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 12:34 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I went through all patches and I have couple things which I'd like to ask
you
about. First of all I'm not that familiar with ID mapping in winbind so my
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 10:56 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 03:01:17PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 12:34 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I went through all patches and I have couple things which I'd like to ask
you
about. First
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:27:55AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 10:56 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 03:01:17PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 12:34 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I went through all patches
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 18:11 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
sure, no problem, here is a sketch about the possilbe additions to
libidmap. Would this work for you?
Looks good to me, with one minor note below.
diff --git a/src/lib/idmap/sss_idmap.h b/src/lib/idmap/sss_idmap.h
index dbb2700..3855d9c
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 10:31 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 15:01 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 12:34 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
So in the default case:
ldap_idmap_range_min = 100,001
ldap_idmap_range_max = 2,000,100,000
ldap_idmap_range_size
On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 09:30 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 10:31 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 15:01 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 12:34 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
So in the default case:
ldap_idmap_range_min = 100,001
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 15:01 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 12:34 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
So in the default case:
ldap_idmap_range_min = 100,001
ldap_idmap_range_max = 2,000,100,000
ldap_idmap_range_size = 100,000
So what this means is that we will have 2000
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 22:12 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 21:53 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
+#define SAFEALIGN_COPY_UINT8(dest, src, pctr) \
+safealign_memcpy(dest, src, sizeof(uint8_t), pctr)
+
+#define SAFEALIGN_COPY_INT8(dest, src, pctr) \
+
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 12:18 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:53:18PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Patch 0006: The meat of the work. This patch will almost certainly be
broken up into multiple patches before formal review, but right now it's
late and I'm tired.
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 12:34 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I went through all patches and I have couple things which I'd like to ask you
about. First of all I'm not that familiar with ID mapping in winbind so my
questions might be trivial. If yes, sorry for that.
First thing: I'd
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:53:18PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Patch 0006: The meat of the work. This patch will almost certainly be
broken up into multiple patches before formal review, but right now it's
late and I'm tired.
This patch initializes the idmap context, reading the LDB for
First of all, these patches are definitely preliminary. I'm mainly
looking for input on whether I'm headed in the right direction.
Patch 0001: Add safe copy functions for 8-bit integers
Patch 0002: LDAP: Add objectSID config option
This patch is not complete (it needs manpages). This
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 21:53 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
+#define SAFEALIGN_COPY_UINT8(dest, src, pctr) \
+safealign_memcpy(dest, src, sizeof(uint8_t), pctr)
+
+#define SAFEALIGN_COPY_INT8(dest, src, pctr) \
+safealign_memcpy(dest, src, sizeof(int8_t), pctr)
+
Assigning a char
14 matches
Mail list logo
