[SSSD] Re: 2.9.{2,4} test failure on armhf: responder_cache_req-tests and pam-srv-tests

2024-04-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi, On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 7:39 AM Alexey Tikhonov wrote: > > Btw, about a patch > https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+git/sssd/+merge/463721/+preview-diff/1051133/+files/preview.diff > that I've found browsing links list: Yep, that's mine, after a long troubleshooting

[SSSD] Re: 2.9.{2,4} test failure on armhf: responder_cache_req-tests and pam-srv-tests

2024-04-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi, On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 7:24 AM Alexey Tikhonov wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 6:26 PM Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > > > Hi, > > The failure is that it expects just one user to be returned, but in > > the end there are two. > > I would print the content of `test_ctx->result` at this point

[SSSD] Re: 2.9.{2,4} test failure on armhf: responder_cache_req-tests and pam-srv-tests

2024-04-05 Thread Alexey Tikhonov
Btw, about a patch https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+git/sssd/+merge/463721/+preview-diff/1051133/+files/preview.diff that I've found browsing links list: wouldn't it be better to use `SPRItime` (defined in 'util/sss_format.h') instead of replacing `%lu` with `%lld`? And

[SSSD] Re: 2.9.{2,4} test failure on armhf: responder_cache_req-tests and pam-srv-tests

2024-04-05 Thread Alexey Tikhonov
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 6:26 PM Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm troubleshooting a set of test failures[1][2] in sssd 2.9.2 and > 2.9.4. They are only failing in armhf, so the usual culprits are > 32bits, slowness of the arch/infrastructure, and now we also have a > time_t change[3] to a