Re: [SSSD] a few questions about sssd

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/02/2009 05:44 AM, David O'Brien wrote: Greetings one and all. I have a couple of questions about sssd, from various places. 1. How long should nss_sss cache negative cache hits before asking the back end again? (from NSS config options

Re: [SSSD] domain vs provider in SSSD

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/02/2009 12:43 AM, David O'Brien wrote: From what I've read, these two are equivalent. Should I be using one term in one place and the other elsewhere or doesn't it matter? Domains and providers are NOT the same thing. A domain is a

Re: [SSSD] a few questions about sssd

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/01/2009 11:44 PM, David O'Brien wrote: Greetings one and all. I have a couple of questions about sssd, from various places. 1. How long should nss_sss cache negative cache hits before asking the back end again? (from NSS config options

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] add sysdb_delete_recursive request to sysdb API

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:51:13PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 05:42:10PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 12:01 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:26:39PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 09:32:34PM +, Simo Sorce

Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] Fail over helper functions and reference counting wrappers

On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 14:07 +0100, Martin Nagy wrote: Hi, attached are patches needed for the fail over functionality. The service discovery is not there yet, I want to hold of with that until I have at least a basic SRV-based one so I can test it properly. It's possible that we will discover

[SSSD] [PATCH] Make debug message less irritating.

Hi, this patch should fix #251. bye, Sumit From 9ec33e808fe82895473e8350eb2e8c5a78ba1ccb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sumit Bose sb...@redhat.com Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:32:00 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Make debug message less irritating. The 'Unable to load' debug message is now only shown when

[SSSD] [PATCH] set ipa_hostname if not given in config file

Hi, I find this patch useful. If IPA_HOSTNAME is found to be NULL later on in the code you can simply assume an error and don't have to call gethostname again and again. bye, Sumit From d87db5a63e0737cc5da955c6679a410350939419 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sumit Bose sb...@redhat.com Date: Wed,

Re: [SSSD] domain vs provider in SSSD

Stephen Gallagher wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/02/2009 12:43 AM, David O'Brien wrote: From what I've read, these two are equivalent. Should I be using one term in one place and the other elsewhere or doesn't it matter? Domains and providers are

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Add support for option descriptions to SSSDConfig API

On 10/30/2009 03:28 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Addresses https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/242 related to authconfig integration Note: this applies atop my previous patch Make config_file_version a hidden setting in SSSDConfig API which is still pending review.

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] add sysdb_delete_recursive request to sysdb API

On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 14:06 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: Looks good to me, I have only a minor nitpick, shouldn't the ENOENT error in sysdb_delete_recursive_op_done() be fatal ? Given it should never happen, does it make sense to allow to continue ? Simo. ok, it is now

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] start adding an attribute map for generic attributes

On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 08:05 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/30/2009 04:44 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 06:20:48PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: While adding infrastructure to use the USN counter for enumerations I found

Re: [SSSD] domain vs provider in SSSD

Stephen Gallagher wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/02/2009 12:43 AM, David O'Brien wrote: From what I've read, these two are equivalent. Should I be using one term in one place and the other elsewhere or doesn't it matter? Domains and providers are NOT the